Rosalia AGUILAR (mother of Sancho)

NAMED ON AN ACT, 15 September 2026 - the first time this archive has had a generation above Sancho on anything but a tree. The baptism of their grandson LUIS ESCOLASTICO at the Iglesia Matriz of Montevideo, 10 February 1811, gives "Abuelos paternos FELIZ GERENA y ROSALIA AGUILAR" in the same sentence that calls their son "Don SANCHO LLERENA natural de ANDALUCIA" . GERENA is the machine's G-for-L - a seventh spelling for this family, and the same mangling that produced the still-unresolved "Dona Andugara GERENA" in the Santa Rosa de Lima confirmations at Rosario. SHE IS THE REASON THIS FAMILY IS CALLED 'LERENA Y AGUILAR' AT ALL. For weeks the matronymic was marked unattested - none of the fourteen Uruguayan records gave Sancho one - and on 14 September this archive built a whole Spanish hypothesis on the idea that AGUILAR came from a GRANDMOTHER, the Ana Maria de Aguilar who married at Santa Ana, Granada in 1754. It comes from his MOTHER, which is simply how Spanish naming works, and the act says so. WHAT IS STILL NOT KNOWN ABOUT THEM: everything else. No dates, no places, no marriage, no other children. The Geneanet pages carry nothing but the line "Family: Revista 15 IEGU", and one Spanish tree offers Cordoba about 1725 and a marriage about 1753 - all values marked "about", with no source at all, and giving Sancho a birth of ca 1754 that the 1812 padron contradicts. So the PARENTAGE is documented and the PEOPLE are not. The search that follows from this is FELIX LERENA and ROSALIA AGUILAR in CORDOBA and it has not been run against Spanish parish records. READ OFF THE PLATE 21 September 2026, where this row had rested on a MACHINE TRANSCRIPT since 14 September. Film 007713375 image 02410, Iglesia Matriz de Montevideo, the baptism of Luis Escolastico, 10 February 1811 - the only record in this archive that names Sancho's own parents. The plate reads 'y Ros[alia] ... lia Aguilar' across the line break - her name survives the check exactly as the transcript gave it.