Willem Hermanus “William Henry” Booyzen
Farmer in 1879, mason in 1905. Died of an ulcer of the stomach after fourteen months — he was not shot by the British.
The record
| Name | Willem Hermanus “William Henry” Booyzen |
| Also written | Booysen (1905 clerk) |
| Born | 4 May 1851, achter Sneeuberg |
| Died | 13 Sep 1905, Indwe |
| Line | Booyzen |
| Generation | 4 — on the direct line |
| Confidence | Documented |
What the archive holds
Farmer in 1879, mason in 1905. Died of an ulcer of the stomach after fourteen months — he was not shot by the British.
Where the archive puts Willem
Each carries the document that puts them there. The atlas →
The line
…4 Nov 1838 Cradock and Johanna Margaritha Pretorius — DOCUMENTED, named by the 1870 Doop Register and by nothing else 4 Willem Hermanus “William Henry” Booyzen parentage DOCUMENTED by two registers; farmer in 1879, mason in 1905; died of a stomach ulcer 4 May 1851, achter Sneeuberg — DOCUMENTED 13 Sep 1905, Indwe — DOCUMENTED Catherine Maria Sophia “Kathleen” Barry (1859–1940), m. 22 Dec 1879 3 George Downing Mountjoy Booyzen S.A.R.…
The households
…The 1863 death notice 9 children Jacobus Nicholas Booysen · bef. 1842 – 1923 Johanna Catharina Booysen · b. 15 May 1844 Petrus Jacobus Booysen · b. 10 Sep 1839 Anna Catharina Booysen · 21 Sep 1842 – bef. 1863 David Schalk Booysen · b. 9 Jun 1848 Willem Hermanus “William Henry” Booyzen · 4 May 1851 – 13 Sep 1905 (the direct line) Magdalena Johanna Francina Booysen · b. 16 Jul 1853 Jan Gerhardus Lodewicus Booysen · b. 4 Dec 1855 Jacoba Catharina Booysen · b.…
The marriages
…The Barrys → bef. 1863 not recorded Petrus Jacobus Booysen & Johanna Margaritha Pretorius a record read here The second marriage his own death notice refuses to name. A christening named her in the end — the oldest open question on this site, answered by a baptism rather than a death. The second wife, named → 22 December 1879 Lady Grey Willem Hermanus “William Henry” Booyzen & Catherine Maria Sophia “Kathleen” Barry a record read here He signs as a BOER. The signature on this register is the one this archive has spent most of its time arguing about: is the letter a z or an s? The name → 8 October 1888 Dordrecht Hercules Johannes Mountjoy & Maria Sophia van Niekerk a record read here Twenty-two and twenty.…
The namesakes
…Who When What they are to the name Willem Hermanus Pieterzen d. bef. 1817 Anna Catharina Slier's FIRST husband. Not a Booyzen, not a Mountjoy, and no blood relation to either. Willem Hermanus Pieterzen the son His son by her, and godfather at the 1851 Graaff-Reinet font — half-brother to Johanna Catharina Mountjoy. Willem Hermanus “William Henry” Booyzen 1851–1905 Named at that font for the godfather standing over it. Generation four of the direct line. Willem Hermanus Booyzen of Indwe c. 1886 The miner. An eighth child this archive did not know it had until the register turned him up. Willem Hermanus Booyzen of Dugmore b. 31 May 1908 Baptised at Indwe, entered “onecht”, his grandmother standing godmother.…
Everyone
…Married Beatrix Magdalena Catharina Boshoff at Mossel Bay; eleven children; left immovable property and a will. The Documents Open Questions Tersia Booyzen Testimony 7 mentions living — Recorded the name-change and Anglo-Boer War account on the MyHeritage tree, as told to her by her father. The Rebels The Name Sources Willem Hermanus “William Henry” Booyzen · generation 4 also written Booysen (1905 clerk) Documented 8 mentions 4 May 1851, achter Sneeuberg 13 Sep 1905, Indwe Farmer in 1879, mason in 1905. Died of an ulcer of the stomach after fourteen months — he was not shot by the British. The Line The Documents The Name The Rebels Willem Hermanus “Willy” Booyzen Documented 5 mentions 15 Oct 1925 1996 Eldest of the Johannesburg family.…
The register
…llem Hermanus Booyzen record ↗ South Africa, Transvaal, Civil Death, 1869-1954 Willem Hermanus Booyzen of Dugmore reconstructed 31 May 1908, Indwe no public link reconstructed by this archive Willem Hermanus Booyzen of Indwe reconstructed c. 1886 · 29 Jul 1932, Johannesburg Hospital — PROBABLY no public link reconstructed by this archive Willem Hermanus “William Henry” Booyzen reconstructed 4 May 1851, achter Sneeuberg · 13 Sep 1905, Indwe no public link reconstructed by this archive Willem Hermanus “Willy” Booyzen reconstructed 15 Oct 1925 · 1996 no public link reconstructed by this archive Willem Jacobus Booyzen Birth 1911 Thabanchu O V S | Death 24 May 1963 Witrand, Cape Province, South Africa record ↗ South Africa, Civil Death Registration, 1953-1967 Willem Johanni…
The timeline
…George Mountjoy Maria Sophia Botha Cradock 31 Oct 1851 Document Willem Hermanus Booyzen baptised at Achter Sneeuwberg Entry 2809. The father is written BOOYZEN with a z — and so, three lines below in the same hand, are the godparents PIETERZEN. The z is the clerk's Dutch, not the family's claim. Willem Hermanus “William Henry” Booyzen Willem Hermanus Pieterzen Achter Sneeuwberg 25 Dec 1862 Document A baptism at Rustenburg that spells the name this archive got wrong Hendrik Nicolaas Stephanus Booijsen, born 31 January 1862, baptised on Christmas Day at Rustenburg. Father Hendrik Stephanus Booijsen; mother ANNA JOHANNA OLIVIER.…
The tree
…SELF GEN 1 GEN 2 GEN 3 GEN 4 GEN 5 GEN 6 Catherine Mary Sophia Booy… 1929 – 2013 Catherine Mary Sophia Booyzen · 1929 – 2013 George Downing M. Booyzen 1901 – 1947 George Downing Mountjoy Booyzen · 1901 – 1947 Willem Hermanus Booyzen 1851 – 1905 Willem Hermanus “William Henry” Booyzen · 1851 – 1905 Petrus Jacobus Booysen 1812 – 1884 Petrus Jacobus Booysen · 1812 – 1884 · also married Johanna Margaritha Pretorius Petrus Jacobus Booysen 1788 – 1876 Petrus Jacobus Booysen · 1788 – 1876 · also married Elizabetha van der Merwe Gerthardus Lodewikus Booys… — – — Gerthardus Lodewikus Booysen · — – — The wall No father. No dates. Nothing behind the button.…
Others on the Booyzen side
All 188 people → · The places → · Search the archive →
A dossier is every mention of a person anywhere in this archive, gathered automatically after the site is built and linked back to the page it appears on. Identity here is by NAME, not by resolved individual — where two people share a name they share this page, and the archive says so rather than guessing. Nothing on a dossier page is new evidence; it is the same evidence, brought together.