The D'Arcy Archive
1532–1621

Alice LEIGH

Alice LEIGH 1532–1621 generation 14 of the tree, above the Hornby graft
married Francis Thomas CONEY [Knight of Bassingthorpe] 1530–1611 tree · above the Hornby graft
written in a record this archive has read from the family tree, untested above a graft this archive rejects

None of the 2 relationships shown here is written in a record this archive has read. Every one comes from the family tree. That is not a claim that they are wrong — it is a statement about what has been checked, and on this site the difference is the point. How claims are labelled →

2 of these links sit above a graft. The archive has tested the join they hang from and rejected it — the D'Arcys of Hornby Castle are unevidenced, the Sneyds of Keele Hall disproved. The people are drawn because the tree carries them, and struck through because nothing attaches them to this family. Both grafts, in full →

The record

Born ABT 1532 Basingthorpe, Lincolnshire, England
Died BEF 1621 Basingthorpe, Lincolnshire, England
Buried Bassingthorpe, Lincolnshire, England

direct line · generation 14 counting back from the present day

Family

Married

Francis Thomas CONEY [Knight of Bassingthorpe] · 6 NOV 1554 at St. Olave, Old Jewry, London, England

Children

Susan (Caney) Coney (1568–1638)

Where this comes from

above a graft This person reaches the family only through the Hornby join, which this archive has tested and rejected. They are published because the tree carries them and deleting a claim is not the same as testing it. The graft →

Every entry naming Alice LEIGH in the register →

See this generation on the spine →

Sources attached in the tree

  • Defranceski Family Site (23andMe) — https://www.myheritage.com/person-3016511_OYYV7JOFPZRJNZZX57TFDF2LPMYJM5A_OYYV7JOFPZRJNZZX57TFDF2LPMYJM5A/alice-leigh-coney
  • Defranceski Family Site (23andMe) — https://www.myheritage.com/person-1503518_OYYV6GKUXZAWW3JW7N66N44DJOOKXCA_OYYV6GKUXZAWW3JW7N66N44DJOOKXCA/alice-cony-born-leigh

These are the citations the family tree carries. Where this archive has checked one against the original, it says so on the relevant page. Method →

← All 473 people · The families · The direct line · How claims are labelled