Bridget Sutton
None of the 4 relationships shown here is written in a record this archive has read. Every one comes from the family tree. That is not a claim that they are wrong — it is a statement about what has been checked, and on this site the difference is the point. How claims are labelled →
4 of these links sit above a graft. The archive has tested the join they hang from and rejected it — the D'Arcys of Hornby Castle are unevidenced, the Sneyds of Keele Hall disproved. The people are drawn because the tree carries them, and struck through because nothing attaches them to this family. Both grafts, in full →
The record
| Born | 1663 | Averham, Nottingham, England |
| Died | 18 APR 1736 | England |
direct line · generation 11 counting back from the present day
Family
Parents
Robert Ambrose Sutton · Mary St. Leger
Married
John Darcy, Lord D'arcy, Lord Conyers
Children
Robert Darcy (1681–1721)
Where this comes from
above a graft This person reaches the family only through the Hornby join, which this archive has tested and rejected. They are published because the tree carries them and deleting a claim is not the same as testing it. The graft →
Everywhere Bridget appears in this archive
Every page of this site that writes about Bridget Sutton, gathered automatically — 1 in total. This is the same evidence as the rest of the archive, brought together in one place.
…22 Westminster, Middlesex 13 Dec 1692 — unproven 11 John Darcy, Lord D'arcy, Lord Conyers Bridget Sutton Alianna (Aline de La Ley) de la Legh Juliana c. 1659 Darcy Meynill, Yorkshire — the tree's geocoder has appended a county in New…
Sources attached in the tree
- MCCARTHY Web Site — Bridget Darcy (born Sutton)
- Defranceski Family Site (23andMe) — https://www.myheritage.com/person-15501881_OYYV7PRTKQ2SOQ4RCB3JBXDOBFZ65MA_OYYV7PRTKQ2SOQ4RCB3JBXDOBFZ65MA/bridget-darcy-born-sutton
- Defranceski Family Site (23andMe) — https://www.myheritage.com/person-1500527_OYYV7FPFU44MFTURIADGVLEWQW2LDOI_OYYV7FPFU44MFTURIADGVLEWQW2LDOI/juliana-conyers
These are the citations the family tree carries. Where this archive has checked one against the original, it says so on the relevant page. Method →
← All 473 people · The families · The direct line · How claims are labelled