Frances de Beaumont
None of the 4 relationships shown here is written in a record this archive has read. Every one comes from the family tree. That is not a claim that they are wrong — it is a statement about what has been checked, and on this site the difference is the point. How claims are labelled →
4 of these links sit above a graft. The archive has tested the join they hang from and rejected it — the D'Arcys of Hornby Castle are unevidenced, the Sneyds of Keele Hall disproved. The people are drawn because the tree carries them, and struck through because nothing attaches them to this family. Both grafts, in full →
The record
| Born | 1580 | of Bedworth and Stoughton, Leicestershire, England |
| Died | 22 DEC 1654 | Market Bosworth, Leicestershire, England, UK. |
direct line · generation 15 counting back from the present day
Family
Parents
Thomas de Beaumont · Catherine Farnham
Married
Wolston (Wolstan) Dixie · 31 AUG 1598 at Clerkenwell, London, England
Children
Elizabeth Dixie (1620–1681)
Where this comes from
above a graft This person reaches the family only through the Keele join, which this archive has tested and rejected. They are published because the tree carries them and deleting a claim is not the same as testing it. The graft →
Sources attached in the tree
- Defranceski Family Site (23andMe) — https://www.myheritage.com/person-1501272_OYYV6JX2FFVR675GBZX6YSCN5A6IS7Q_OYYV6JX2FFVR675GBZX6YSCN5A6IS7Q/frances-dixie-born-beaumont
- Defranceski Family Site (23andMe) — https://www.myheritage.com/person-16009391_OYYV6222QUISWNIYM7PCWG5OK7MPWZI_OYYV6222QUISWNIYM7PCWG5OK7MPWZI/frances-dixie-born-de-beaumont
- Defranceski Family Site (23andMe) — https://www.myheritage.com/person-1529217_OYYV6BA3UFGJFD6DHDLBUKYF7IQQASA_OYYV6BA3UFGJFD6DHDLBUKYF7IQQASA/frances-dixie-born-beaumont
- Defranceski Family Site (23andMe) — https://www.myheritage.com/person-3000862_OYYV76MN7RSYNSUKDO7J2SPW3XOOLTI_OYYV76MN7RSYNSUKDO7J2SPW3XOOLTI/frances-dixie-born-beaumont
These are the citations the family tree carries. Where this archive has checked one against the original, it says so on the relevant page. Method →
← All 473 people · The families · The direct line · How claims are labelled