Frederick I of Denmark
None of the 4 relationships shown here is written in a record this archive has read. Every one comes from the family tree. That is not a claim that they are wrong — it is a statement about what has been checked, and on this site the difference is the point. How claims are labelled →
4 of these links sit above a graft. The archive has tested the join they hang from and rejected it — the D'Arcys of Hornby Castle are unevidenced, the Sneyds of Keele Hall disproved. The people are drawn because the tree carries them, and struck through because nothing attaches them to this family. Both grafts, in full →
The record
direct line · generation 17 counting back from the present day
Where this comes from
above a graft This person reaches the family only through the Hornby join, which this archive has tested and rejected. They are published because the tree carries them and deleting a claim is not the same as testing it. The graft →
Everywhere Frederick appears in this archive
Every page of this site that writes about Frederick I of Denmark, gathered automatically — 2 in total. This is the same evidence as the rest of the archive, brought together in one place.
…ust. If you accept… Generations Ancestors Reaches Note Everything the tree asserts 24 243 Frederick I of Denmark, d. 1533 Accepts both grafts below. This archive does not. Accepting the Sneyd graft only 17 172 Thomas Dabridgecourt of Longdon…
…mark Somebody in this family will eventually put " Danish 4.4% " next to " descended from Frederick I of Denmark " and join them. This section exists so that when they do, the answer is already written down. The tree's own descent predicts 0.…
← All 473 people · The families · The direct line · How claims are labelled