Thomas Darcy
None of the 2 relationships shown here is written in a record this archive has read. Every one comes from the family tree. That is not a claim that they are wrong — it is a statement about what has been checked, and on this site the difference is the point. How claims are labelled →
2 of these links sit above a graft. The archive has tested the join they hang from and rejected it — the D'Arcys of Hornby Castle are unevidenced, the Sneyds of Keele Hall disproved. The people are drawn because the tree carries them, and struck through because nothing attaches them to this family. Both grafts, in full →
The record
| Born | 5 JUL 1565 | Of, Hornby Castle, Yorkshire, England |
| Died | 6 NOV 1605 | London, Middlesex, England |
direct line · generation 15 counting back from the present day
Where this comes from
above a graft This person reaches the family only through the Hornby join, which this archive has tested and rejected. They are published because the tree carries them and deleting a claim is not the same as testing it. The graft →
Everywhere Thomas appears in this archive
Every page of this site that writes about Thomas Darcy, gathered automatically — 1 in total. This is the same evidence as the rest of the archive, brought together in one place.
…line continues past the last person shown here. Gen Person Born At Died Trade Standing 15 Thomas Darcy Elizabeth Conyers 5 Jul 1565 Of, Hornby Castle, Yorkshire, England 6 Nov 1605 — unproven 14 Conyers (of Hornby Castle) D'arcy Dor…
Sources attached in the tree
- WikiTree — https://www.myheritage.com/research/record-10109-1601657/thomas-darcy-in-wikitree
These are the citations the family tree carries. Where this archive has checked one against the original, it says so on the relevant page. Method →
← All 473 people · The families · The direct line · How claims are labelled