William Sanigar
None of the 2 relationships shown here is written in a record this archive has read. Every one comes from the family tree. That is not a claim that they are wrong — it is a statement about what has been checked, and on this site the difference is the point. How claims are labelled →
The record
| Born | 1654 |
direct line · generation 12 counting back from the present day
Where this comes from
No relationship on this page has been checked against a record. Everything here is what the family tree says, which is a claim and not a source. How claims are labelled →
Everywhere William appears in this archive
Every page of this site that writes about William Sanigar, gathered automatically — 3 in total. This is the same evidence as the rest of the archive, brought together in one place.
…ers. For as long as this archive has existed it has said its deepest documented person is William Sanigar, born 1654, of Berkeley in Gloucestershire — twelve generations back. An audit found that claim rested on other people's family t…
…lve . The oldest of them are not aristocrats and there is no castle anywhere in the list: William Sanigar , born 1654, and William Saniger , born at Berkeley, Gloucestershire , 12 October 1679 — reached through Hannah Saniger, Miriam W…
…man in 1601, and a gentleman clothier in 1692 The archive's deepest published person is a William Sanigar said to be born in 1654. These entries reach fifty years behind him and describe a family already established: John Saniger of Be…
Sources attached in the tree
- Gainard Family Tree Web Site — William Sanigar
These are the citations the family tree carries. Where this archive has checked one against the original, it says so on the relevant page. Method →
← All 473 people · The families · The direct line · How claims are labelled