The D'Arcy Archive
Portsea 1780 – Lymington 1848 · found 13 September 2026

Lieutenant-Colonel Joseph D'Arcy

The first person in this archive's English line, and the one it knew least about. Saint-Domingue, Sicily, Walcheren, and five years in Persia in the service of the Shah's son.

Joseph D'Arcy is the first person in this archive's English line — baptised at Portsea on 19 March 1780, son of Robert and Jean, the record that survived inside a twenty-two-month transcript. After that he disappeared. He signed his sister's marriage at Chatham in 1806 and then nothing, for a hundred and forty years of family memory. Here is the rest of him.

London Evening Standard, Friday 11 February 1848, page 4

The death

On the 7th inst., at Homestead, Lymington, Hants, LIEUTENANT COLONEL D'ARCY, LATE ROYAL ARTILLERY, K.L.S., in the 69th year of his age. documented

Death registered at Lymington, Hampshire, March quarter 1848 — volume 8, page 159

Morning Post, Monday 3 April 1848, page 2

And a will

LIEUTENANT-COLONEL JOSEPH D'ARCY, [late] of the Royal Artillery, formerly of PRIESTLANDS, NEAR LYMINGTON, but late of HOME MEAD, SOUTHAMPTON, who died on the 7th of February, at the age of 69, had EXECUTED HIS WILL IN THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1844, leaving …

The article goes on to summarise what he left, and the digitised text stops there. The will itself was proved in 1848 and is at Kew. On the queue →
Morning Herald (London), 29 February 1848, p.4 · Saunders's News-Letter (Dublin), 2 March 1848 · Lincolnshire Chronicle, 3 March 1848, p.6

The obituary

Died, on the 7th of February, at his residence, HOME MEAD, LYMINGTON, HAMPSHIRE, in his 68th year, LIEUT. COLONEL D'ARCY, LATE OF THE ROYAL ARTILLERY. He commenced his military career at THE TAKING OF ST. DOMINGO IN 1793; he served also IN SICILY and at THE TAKING OF WALCHEREN; he was FIVE YEARS IN PERSIA IN THE SERVICE OF PRINCE ABBAS MIRZA, son [of the] King of Persia, who for … documented

Three papers carried the same notice and the digitised text breaks in a different place in each; the wording above is assembled from all three, with the breaks marked.

The Gentleman's Magazine, March 1848, p.328

And the magazine of record did notice him

The Gentleman's Magazine for March 1848, page 328, in its county list of deaths for Hampshire. A fourth independent notice, and the only one from a national magazine rather than a newspaper.

Feb. 7. At Homestead, Lymington, aged 68, Lieut.-Col. Joseph D'Arcy, late of the Royal Art. K.L.S. He entered as 2d Lieut. 1795, attained the brevet rank of Major 1813, and Lieut.-Col. 1816. In 1818 he received permission to accept the second class of the order of the Lion and Sun, conferred for his conduct when in the actual service of the Shah of Persia. documented

It settles the age two to one

Three sources, three phrasings. The London Evening Standard says “in the 69th year of his age”, which means he had turned 68. The Morning Herald says “in his 68th year”, which means he had turned 67. The Gentleman's Magazine says flatly “AGED 68”. Two of the three agree, and they agree with the baptism: a man baptised at Portsea on 19 March 1780 and dying on 7 February 1848 was 67 and eleven months — so “aged 68” is the rounding and “in his 68th year” is the exact one.

The three notices do not quite agree, and saying so is worth more than picking one. What they jointly rule out is any birth much before 1779, which is the only thing this archive needed them for. corroboration, with the disagreement stated

Shah, not King

The Gazette of 1818 says the order was “conferred on him by the KING OF PERSIA”. The Royal Military Calendar of 1820 says “in the actual service of the King of Persia”. The Gentleman's Magazine of 1848 says “in the actual service of the SHAH of Persia”. The same phrase, three times over thirty years, with one word changing — which is how a fact travels rather than how it is invented.

Read 15 September 2026 in the full text of all twelve monthly issues of 1848 on the Internet Archive.

The Royal Military Calendar, 1820

The service record, at last

This page has said for weeks that the archive “has not yet seen a service record, and does not know the years”. It has one now. The Royal Military Calendar of 1820 — the army's own published record of its serving officers — carries him among the Lieutenant-Colonels at entry 1667.

1667. Lieut.-Col. Joseph D'Arcy. Second Lieut. Rl Artillery, 6th March, 1795; First Lieut. 29th June, 1796; Capt.-Lieut. 12th Sept. 1803; Second Capt. 19th July, 1804; Capt. 24th Oct. 1806; brevet Maj. 25th Nov. 1813; and L.-Col. 31st Dec. 1816. documented
DateRank
6 March 1795 Second Lieutenant, Royal ArtilleryHe was fifteen — baptised at Portsea in March 1780
29 June 1796 First Lieutenant
12 September 1803 Captain-Lieutenant
19 July 1804 Second Captain
24 October 1806 Captain
25 November 1813 Brevet Major
31 December 1816 Lieutenant-ColonelThe rank he held at his death in 1848, and the one every newspaper gives him

And Persia stops being an inference

The Calendar does not merely list the decoration. It says why he had it: “L.-Col. D. received, in 1818, the insignia of the 2d class of the PERSIAN ORDER OF THE LION AND SUN, FOR HIS CONDUCT, WHILE IN THE ACTUAL SERVICE OF THE KING OF PERSIA.” documented — the army's own record, printed in his lifetime

This archive had the Persian service from an obituary and the order from a death notice, and graded the service as inferred because the two merely corroborated one another. The army's own book, printed in 1820 while he was alive and serving, states the service outright and in those words — in the ACTUAL SERVICE of the King of Persia. The chip on this page changes from inferred to documented.

And what it still does not give. What it still does not give is the years he was there, or the name of the prince he served. The obituary's Abbas Mirza remains an identification this archive has made, not one the Calendar makes.

Read 15 September 2026 in the free full text of the 1820 third edition, volume V, on the Internet Archive.

Prince Abbas Mirza

Five years in Persia

ABBAS MIRZA was the Qajar crown prince, and in the 1810s and 1820s he was rebuilding the Persian army on a European model with British officers to help him. That is what Joseph D'Arcy was doing there, and it is why a separate notice gives him as K.L.S. — Knight of the Royal Order of the Lion and the Sun, the Shah's decoration.

The archive had the service from an obituary and the order from a death notice, which corroborated each other without either being official. It now has the army's own record: the Royal Military Calendar of 1820 gives his seven commissions and states the decoration was “for his conduct, while in the actual service of the King of Persia”. What is still missing is the YEARS he was there and the name of the prince he served — Abbas Mirza is this archive's identification, not the Calendar's. the service, from the army's own record of 1820
Lady's Newspaper, 8 April 1848

And a wife named Katherine

The Lady's Newspaper of 8 April 1848 carried the same will summary as the Morning Post and got a little further before the scan fails: he left his “property to his wife, KATHE[RINE] D'ARCY, to which she h[as] …”

A name this archive did not have. Joseph D'Arcy married, and his widow outlived him. People the tree never had →
K.L.S.

And three letters after his name

One notice gives him as “Lieutenant Colonel D'Arcy, late Royal Artillery, K.L.S.” — Knight of the Royal Order of the Lion and Sun, a Persian decoration. It was given to British officers who served on the missions to the Shah's army in the 1810s and 1820s.

And the decoration is now gazetted, not inferred.

“The Prince Regent has given permission to LIEUT.-COL. D'ARCY to wear the insignia of the SECOND CLASS OF THE IMPERIAL ORDER OF THE LION AND SUN, conferred on him by the KING OF PERSIA; but not to assume any style, appellation, rank, precedence …”

London Gazette, Tuesday 30 June 1818 — carried within the week by the London Moderator (1 July), the Mirror of the Times (4 July), the Englishman and Johnson's Sunday Monitor (5 July) and the Maidstone Journal (7 July). documented
This page said the archive “has not yet traced his Persian service, and will not assert it from three letters after his name”. It is traced. The three letters are a Crown grant of permission, published in the official gazette, and they date the service to before the middle of 1818 — which fits the obituary's five years with Abbas Mirza and the newspaper reports of English officers wintering with the Prince's newly raised corps, carried in the Hampshire Chronicle as early as October 1812.

What this page said until 15 September 2026: This archive has not yet traced his Persian service, and will not assert it from three letters. What the letters establish is that he held a foreign order, which for a Royal Artillery officer of that generation points one way.

1841 census · PRIESTLANDS, Milford, Lymington, Hampshire · HO107/393 book 4, folio 3, page 1, schedule 352

Priestlands, 1841

Twenty people under one roof: the family, a brother, a Mrs Pitt, and eleven servants.

NameAgeBornBirth county
Joseph Darcy 611780 HAMPSHIREthe Colonel himself
Catherine Darcy 421799 —his wife — the “Kathe[rine]” of the will
Richard Darcy 571784 —of Joseph's own generation, in Joseph's house
Catherine Darcy 91832 Hampshire
John Darcy 81833 Hampshire
Josephine Darcy 61835 Hampshire
Frank Darcy 21839 —
Joseph Darcy 01841 Hampshireborn in the census year
Elizabeth PITT 551786 —and this is the surname that has been sitting in this family's names for two centuries

Then eleven more: Laura Dillard, Joseph Hyde, Charles Hamby, Thomas Williams, Mary Finch, Jane Jennings, Ann Russ, Harriet Marshall, Rachael Barter, Loise Croucher and Jane Viney. A household of twenty with eleven servants is a gentleman's establishment, not a half-pay officer's cottage.

Born in Hampshire. The 1841 census gives Joseph's birth county as HAMPSHIRE and his age as 61, which is a birth in 1780. Portsea is in Hampshire. This is independent corroboration of the baptism of 19 March 1780 — the entry that survives only because it falls inside a twenty-two-month transcript — from a census taken sixty-one years later. documented twice
Where the name came from?

Elizabeth Pitt, aged 55

Living in the house in 1841, between the youngest child and the servants, is an ELIZABETH PITT, born about 1786. This archive's line runs through GEORGE PITT D'ARCY — the name recurs for four generations, down to a George Pitt D'Arcy born at Brisbane in 1864 — and nobody has ever known where the Pitt came from.

Carefully. A census does not say who she was. She is not called a relative, because the 1841 census does not record relationships at all. What can be said is that a woman named Pitt was living in the household of Robert D'Arcy's son in 1841, and that Robert D'Arcy's other son had carried Pitt as a middle name since 1783. That is a connection worth chasing and it is not yet an explanation. a lead, and thinner than it was George Pitt D'Arcy →

Tested twice, and the second test made it weaker rather than stronger. Elizabeth Pitt's death was registered at Lymington in the first quarter of 1851, which was read here as meaning she stayed in the district after Joseph died and so belonged to the household rather than visiting it. On 21 September the same index was asked about the surname instead of the woman: 21 PITT deaths were registered at Lymington between 1820 and 1900 — Catherine, Catherine Maria, James, John, John Daniel, Martha, Mary and the rest. Pitt is an ordinary surname in that corner of Hampshire. A Pitt dying at Lymington is what Lymington does, so her death there says nothing about who she was to this family. What survives is the census and only the census: a woman named Pitt in the house of Robert D'Arcy's son, while Robert's other son had carried Pitt as a middle name since 1783. No newspaper notice for her survives; the 1841 census records no relationships. The question needs her death certificate, or a will.

And a RICHARD DARCY, aged 57, born about 1784 — in the house, of Joseph's own generation and a year younger than George Pitt D'Arcy. The archive has never heard of him. Robert and Jean married at Portsea in June 1779 and baptised Joseph there in March 1780; a Richard of 1784 fits that family exactly, and the Portsea transcript stops in 1782 so his baptism would never have been found in it. Searched for him across Hampshire in every record type and found nothing further: he is a name, an age and an address, in his brother's house. Why his baptism would never have been found →

Sixty-eight years

What is on record

19 March 1780Baptised at Portsea St Mary, son of ROBERT and JEAN
1793“Commenced his military career at the taking of St Domingo”
1795In the Royal Artillery officers' list
1798Army List
1806Witness at his sister Margarett Maria Isabella's marriage at Chatham
1809At the taking of Walcheren; and served in Sicily
1810s–1820sFIVE YEARS IN PERSIA in the service of Prince Abbas Mirza — and Knight of the Lion and Sun
1840–1844Still in the Army Lists
February 1844Executes his will, leaving his property to his wife Katherine
7 February 1848Dies at Home Mead, Lymington, in his 68th year

And he left at least one son. The Cork Daily Herald of 3 October 1863 carries a marriage at Lymington of a D'Arcy “son of the late Colonel D'Arcy, R.A.” — the same town, fifteen years on. The OCR loses the groom's forename.

Two wrinkles, both stated rather than smoothed. The papers cannot agree whether he died in his 68th or 69th year — 68th fits the Portsea baptism of March 1780 almost exactly. And if he began at St Domingo in 1793 he was thirteen, which is early even for that army. A boy of thirteen could go as a cadet or a volunteer and be commissioned at fifteen, which is what the Royal Artillery list showing him from 1795 would then mean. It is also possible the obituarist rounded a date fifty-five years old.
1848–1852

After him

October 1848

PRIESTLANDS is broken into lots and advertised for sale — “Lot 5, Higher Priestlands; Lot 6, Lower Priestlands” — Exeter Flying Post, 19 October 1848

1851

ELIZABETH PITT dies at Lymington, her death registered in the district. She had not moved away

21 February 1852

“Mrs. D'Arcy … 5 0” subscribes to a Lymington public fund got up by the Mayor, among the local clergy and gentry — Hampshire Advertiser. The widow was still in the town four years on

She is not in the 1851 census under any Darcy spelling in Hampshire, which is a gap in the index rather than a departure — the subscription list puts her there the following February.

Bath, November 1817

Joseph D'Arcy married the daughter of an earl, and had a family by her this archive never knew about

The five Milford children are his SECOND family. Two death notices, five years apart, name a first one — and name their mother.

Saint James's Chronicle, Saturday 23 May 1857, page 1

“May 13, at St. Helier's, Jersey, RICHARD, THIRD SON of the late LIEUT. COL. D'ARCY, ROYAL ARTILLERY, and LADY CATHERINE, SISTER OF THE PRESENT EARL DE LA WARR, aged 33.”

London Evening Standard and Morning Herald, both Wednesday 25 June 1862

“D'ARCY. — On the 14th inst., at Bangor, North Wales, CAPTAIN ROBERT D'ARCY, LATE OF THE INDIA COMPANY'S ARMY, son of the late COLONEL D'ARCY, of the ROYAL ARTILLERY, and LADY CATHERINE, DAUGHTER OF THE LATE AND SISTER OF THE PRESENT EARL DE LA WARR.”

“The late Lieut. Col. D'Arcy, Royal Artillery” is Joseph, who died at Lymington in 1848. The family tree has always given him a wife CATHERINE GEORGIANA WEST, married at BATH in NOVEMBER 1817, and this archive has never looked at the name. WEST is the family name of the EARLS DE LA WARR. Two newspapers, independently, call her LADY CATHERINE and make her a peer's daughter and a peer's sister.

CAPTAIN ROBERT D'ARCY
late of the Honourable East India Company's Army
Died at BANGOR, North Wales, 14 June 1862. Named for his grandfather the Major-General.
RICHARD D'ARCY
described as the THIRD SON
Died at ST HELIER, JERSEY, 13 May 1857, AGED 33 — so born about 1824.
“Third son” is the load-bearing phrase. If Richard was the third, there was a first and a second, and Robert is one of them. So Joseph D'Arcy had AT LEAST THREE SONS by Lady Catherine before he married Katherine Lucy Eliza Hyde in November 1830 and had five more children at Milford. This archive credited him with five children this morning. It is now at least eight, across two marriages, and the first marriage was into the peerage. documented
The register · 22 September 2026

Both baptisms found, the first son named at last, and the mother confirmed from a register

The notices gave a third son and a second. The first was never named anywhere, and he is now. Two baptisms at Westminster, to Joseph D'Arcy and Katharine Georgiana, complete the order the 1857 notice implied and close a gap this page has carried since it was written.

BaptisedChildFatherMotherPlace
31 August 1818GEORGE ABBAS KOOLY D'ARCYJoseph D'ArcyKatharine GeorgianaWestminster
16 October 1820ROBERT WEST D'ARCYJoseph D'ArcyCatherine GeorgianaWestminster

documented

Three sons, in order, and the notice was counting correctly. Joseph married at Bath in November 1817. George was baptised nine months later, in August 1818. Robert followed in October 1820. Richard was 33 when he died in May 1857, which puts his birth about 1824 — and the Saint James's Chronicle called him «THIRD SON of the late Lieut. Col. D'Arcy and Lady Catherine». First, second, third, with no room left over. The phrase that told this archive two sons existed has now been checked against the register that names them. documented
And the eldest is named for the prince his father served. ABBAS KOOLY is Abbas Qoli, and the Prince is Abbas Mirza. This page already documents Joseph's five years in Persia in the service of Prince Abbas Mirza, and dates the service to before the middle of 1818 from the Crown's own grant of permission in the gazette.

The son was baptised on 31 August 1818. A man came home from Persia and, within weeks, christened his first-born after the prince he had served. Nothing about that is inference: the service is documented from the gazette, the baptism is documented from the register, and the name is in both. It is also the strongest evidence yet that this Joseph is the Joseph — there is no second Joseph D'Arcy in England naming a child after a Qajar prince. documented

And the second son carries his mother's surname. The family tree has always given Joseph's first wife as CATHERINE GEORGIANA WEST, married at Bath in November 1817, and this archive has said in the paragraph above that WEST is the family name of the Earls De La Warr. Both halves of that were a tree assertion and a remark.

The registers now carry the forenames independently — Katharine Georgiana in 1818, Catherine Georgiana in 1820, one woman under two ordinary spellings — and the second son is christened ROBERT WEST D'ARCY, his mother's maiden surname standing as his middle name in the same way Paul Cole Atkinson carries his grandmother's on [/atkinson](/atkinson/).

Which Earl De La Warr is still not asserted here, for the reason this page already gives: that is a fact about the peerage, in a reference book this archive has not opened. inferred

Where the two of them went. GEORGE ABBAS KOOLY D'ARCY followed his father into the army — he is in military records for 1840 and 1841 — and died in Devon in 1885, as «George Abbas-Kooli D'Arcy», sixty-seven years after the christening. ROBERT WEST D'ARCY is the Captain Robert of the notice above: late of the Honourable East India Company's Army, dead at Bangor on 14 June 1862, and the newspaper index gives his birth as 1821 against the register's 1820. Neither man's later life has been read here beyond the index entries, and both are now findable. inferred
And a day later, the two boys still had no record against their names. The baptisms were written up on this page the day they were found and did not reach the register for a day. Until they did, [George Abbas Kooli D'Arcy](/people/george-abbas-kooli-d-arcy/) carried the line «No record has been found for them» and both boys' pedigree charts drew the link to their father as tree, untested — while this page said a register named him. That is a filing failure, not a research failure, and it is the same one [crossread.py](/method/) was written for in September, when Constantine D'Arcy's christening sat on one page for weeks while three others called him unplaced.

Their mother still cannot be drawn. Both registers name her, and she now has a record line of her own — but the family tree holds Catherine Georgiana West as a name attached to a marriage, not as a person, so there is no node on any chart to draw an edge to. She is one of 77 name-only partners in 130 marriages here. A woman can be named in two parish registers and still have no page in this archive, and the reason is the shape of the tree rather than the state of the evidence. documented

Cambridgeshire Burials, transcribed by the Cambridgeshire and Huntingdonshire Family History Society

And she is buried, with a date and an age

CATHERINE GEORGIANA DARCY, aged 36, OF BATH · buried 22 MARCH 1824 · BOURN, Cambridgeshire documented

Three things fall into place. THE AGE: 36 in 1824 gives a birth about 1788, which makes her twenty-nine at the Bath marriage of November 1817. THE RESIDENCE: “OF BATH” — the town she married in, seven years later. AND THE DATE: she died in 1824, and Joseph married Katherine Lucy Eliza Hyde in November 1830, so the six-year gap between his two families is now measured rather than assumed.

One inference, and two things unexplained. One inference, and it is only that. Her son RICHARD, the third son, was 33 when he died in May 1857, which puts his birth about 1824 — the year his mother died at thirty-six. A death in childbed would explain both, and nothing here says so. WHY she is buried at Bourn in Cambridgeshire, a hundred and fifty miles from Bath and further still from Lymington, is not explained either.
And what is not claimed here. What is documented is what the notices say: two sons, their mother's style and her brother's title, and Richard's place in the order. WHICH Earl De La Warr, and therefore Lady Catherine's own parentage, is not stated in either notice and is not asserted here — the Earl who was “present” in 1857 and 1862 is a fact about the peerage, not about this family, and it belongs in a reference book this archive has not opened. The first and second sons are unnamed. And when Lady Catherine died is unknown, beyond its being before November 1830. documented, and deliberately unfinished
Milford House, and after

The five children, and what became of them

Joseph's will of 1844 left his property to his wife and FIVE CHILDREN, and this archive has never been able to name them. All five are baptised at MILFORD, Hampshire, to JOSEPH and KATHERINE LUCY ELIZA — and the register calls him “Lt Col RA of MILFORD HOUSE”, an address this archive did not have.

These are the children of his SECOND marriage, to KATHERINE LUCY ELIZA HYDE in November 1830.

CATHERINE LUCY JANE D'ARCY

baptised Milford, 23 January 1832

Aged 9 at Priestlands in 1841. A Katherine Lucy Elizabeth D'Arcy dies at Lymington in 1863 — the mother, not the daughter, on the dates.

JOHN HYDE D'ARCY

baptised Milford, 30 May 1833

HARROW SCHOOL — he is in the Harrow School Register 1801–1893. DIED AT SOUTHAMPTON, 28 JUNE 1852, AGED NINETEEN, and was buried there. His death was carried as far as the Catholic Telegraph in Dublin.

JOSEPHINE D'ARCY

baptised Milford, 1836

Aged 6 at Priestlands in 1841.

FRANK HYDE D'ARCY

baptised Milford, 22 June 1839 — BORN 14 DECEMBER 1838 AT MADEIRA

Married ANNA MARIA SIMPSON at Lymington, 29 September 1863. DIED AT WORCESTER, 15 JUNE 1868, AGED TWENTY-NINE, and was brought home to be buried at PENNINGTON on the 20th.

JOSEPH WILLIAM D'ARCY

baptised Milford, 6 July 1841

Born in the census year, and an infant in the Priestlands household.

Madeira. The note against Frank's baptism is four words long and it opens a country: “bn 14 Dec 1838 in MADEIRA”. Joseph D'Arcy was not at Milford in the winter of 1838 — he was on a Portuguese island in the Atlantic, where consumptive and half-pay Englishmen wintered, and his son was born there. NOTHING IN THIS ARCHIVE KNEW THAT.

And a grandson, baptised five months after his father died

FRANK HAMILTON HYDE D'ARCY, baptised at CROYDON COMMON, ST JAMES, Surrey, on 26 NOVEMBER 1868 — father FRANK HYDE, occupation “GENTLEMAN”, mother ANNA MARIA, of ST JAMES ROAD, Croydon. His father had died at Worcester on 15 June. He died at Chelmsford, Essex, in 1910.

Four generations of this family in England, from a major-general's son baptised at Portsea in 1780 to a boy christened at Croydon in 1868 — and until today the archive had the first and the last of them and nothing between. documented
23 January 1832CATHERINE LUCY JANE baptised at Milford — father “Lt Col RA of Milford House”
30 May 1833JOHN HYDE baptised at Milford
1836JOSEPHINE baptised at Milford
14 December 1838FRANK HYDE born AT MADEIRA
22 June 1839FRANK HYDE baptised at Milford
6 July 1841JOSEPH WILLIAM baptised at Milford
7 February 1848JOSEPH D'ARCY dies at Home Mead, Lymington
28 June 1852JOHN HYDE dies at Southampton, aged 19
1863KATHERINE LUCY ELIZABETH D'ARCY dies at Lymington
29 September 1863FRANK HYDE marries ANNA MARIA SIMPSON at Lymington
15 June 1868FRANK HYDE dies at Worcester, aged 29; buried Pennington on the 20th
26 November 1868FRANK HAMILTON HYDE baptised at Croydon, his father five months dead
1910FRANK HAMILTON HYDE dies at Chelmsford, Essex
None of these five is on the family tree, so none of them belongs in the pedigree — they go on the new generations page. Two of the three sons died young: John at nineteen in 1852, Frank at twenty-nine in 1868. What became of Joseph William, Catherine Lucy Jane and Josephine is not yet known. documented The new generations →
The National Archives IR 27/284

And the will has a second document

JOSEPH D'ARCY of Lymington, Hampshire, grant year 1848, court “PCC and Country Courts” — Index to Death Duty Registers 1796-1903, The National Archives IR 27/284. The Death Duty register behind that index (IR 26) states the value of the estate and names the legatees and executors, often in more detail than the will itself. That is now two documents at Kew rather than one, and the index reference for finding them.

What it would cost to read →

Why it matters

The archive now holds Robert D'Arcy's marriage, his career, his death and his funeral; his son George Pitt D'Arcy's marriage and Irish service; and his son Joseph's whole life — Saint-Domingue, Sicily, Walcheren, five years in Persia with the Shah's son, a Persian knighthood, a house in Hampshire and a widow named Katherine. Three years ago the family tree had a name and a rumour of Yorkshire.

The baptism → · His father's career → · His brother → · His father's death →