The D'Arcy Archive
1681–1776

Thomas (Francis) D'Arcy

Thomas (Francis) D'Arcy 1681–1776 generation — of the tree, above the Hornby graft
married Margaret? D'Arcy tree · above the Hornby graft · direct line
written in a record this archive has read from the family tree, untested above a graft this archive rejects

None of the 7 relationships shown here is written in a record this archive has read. Every one comes from the family tree. That is not a claim that they are wrong — it is a statement about what has been checked, and on this site the difference is the point. How claims are labelled →

7 of these links sit above a graft. The archive has tested the join they hang from and rejected it — the D'Arcys of Hornby Castle are unevidenced, the Sneyds of Keele Hall disproved. The people are drawn because the tree carries them, and struck through because nothing attaches them to this family. Both grafts, in full →

The record

Born BET 24 NOV 1681 AND 21 JUL 1710 St. James Palace, London, Middlesex, Englan
Died ABT 21 JUL 1776

direct line

Counted here with the D'Arcy family · that family →

Family

Parents

Robert Darcy · Friederike Susanna Frederica von Schönburg

Married

Margaret? D'Arcy

Brothers and sisters

George Schomberg d'Arcy (1716–1722) · Caroline Louisa D'ARCY (1717–1778)

Children

Robert D'Arcy (1751–1827) · Constantine D'Arcy (1759–1778)

Where this comes from

above a graft This person reaches the family only through the Hornby join, which this archive has tested and rejected. They are published because the tree carries them and deleting a claim is not the same as testing it. The graft →

Every entry naming Thomas (Francis) D'Arcy in the register →

See this generation on the spine →

Everywhere Thomas appears in this archive

Every page of this site that writes about Thomas (Francis) D'Arcy, gathered automatically — 4 in total. This is the same evidence as the rest of the archive, brought together in one place.

Open Questions

…e the tree's self-contradiction The note says 4th Earl; the structure descends through a "Thomas (Francis) D'Arcy" from the 3rd. Establish which claim came first and who made it — a nineteenth-century family bible, a Victorian county history,…

The Spine

…, Middlesex, England, Kingdom of England 20 Jan 1721 Earl of Holdernesse ( 3rd unproven 9 Thomas (Francis) D'Arcy Margaret? D'Arcy between 24 Nov 1681 and 21 Jul 1710 St. James Palace, London, Middlesex, Englan c. 21 Jul 1776 — disputed 8 Robe…

How Far Back

…idenced The D'Arcys of Hornby Castle Above Major-General Robert D'Arcy the tree inserts a Thomas (Francis) D'Arcy , said to be born at St James's Palace, carrying two birth years sixty-nine years apart, and descends him from the Earls of Holde…

The Hornby Claim

…. But the tree's actual structure hangs Robert not off the 4th Earl at all — it inserts a Thomas (Francis) D'Arcy , said to be born at St James's Palace, and descends him from the 3rd Earl. Two different claims about the same join, in the same…

What is written about Thomas

Carried across from the family tree, with its markup stripped. Family testimony, not an independent record — valuable, and labelled.

Possibly 4th Earl of Holderness Soldier of Fortune. Said to have been killed in the American War. Thought to be the Illigitimate son of Robert Earl of Holderness Commanded a regiment during the American War. Killed in action leaving 2 sons. On his voyage to America Col D'Arcy and his family were wrecked. They lost all their baggage and papers, which it is believed would have proved their noble descent. After her husband was killed Mrs D'Arcy returned to England with her sons. There is a mystery as to who / whether this Francis existed. No records have yet been found and Robert his son always refused to say who his father actually was. The link to the 4th Earl however is well documented though not as a direct relation (admitted anyway). From "Ancestral Voices" by Berta Ruck "We know that he was "wrecked" on his voyage to America to fight as a volunteer in the American war and that in this wreck personal papers including, birth certificate and documents with the names of his parents were lost. It was rumoured (not through family letters) but handed down talk that the loss of these personal papers was engineered to avaoid a possible scandal. The Yorkshire Myth - by rights perhaps he was not of that branch of the D'Arcy family - he had been taken on by them for some unexplained reason to PASS as their child." GAK D'A wrote " from a variety of circumstantial evidence I am inclined to believe that the General (Robert) was an illegitimate son of the last Earl of Holderness who died in 1788. The name Robert - The general having been born and educated in Yorkshire, passing his holidays in Holderness House, London. His silence about his father, of whom he never spoke. His powerful friend, the Marquiss of Townshend, a relation of Earl Holderness, taking him by the hand - and making much of him. My father saying he never knew who his grandfather was - One of his sons being named Considine, a family name with the Yorkshire D'Arcys." There is also a letter to GAKD'A from his cousin Frederick in Australia "your excellent father (J. D'Arcy) gave me to understand before he left England that the title of Holderness had been traced to you, or rather to the General (Robert) who was then alive. I think your father touched up a little by your uncle De La Warr, (Lady Catherine's dearest brother) thought of applying to Chancery but considered that he was not of sufficient financial calibre. I believe caviats are invited and always entered by Parties having spurious claims merely to exact tips. However I look upon you (George A K D'A) as the Earl of Holderness proper." If any of this is to be believed then Robert would be direct link to the 4th Earl and we would not be looking for the Thomas or Francis (Soldier of Fortune). There is also a possibility that he was from Westmeath and of the D'Arcy's of Platten - this was recorded by George Abbas D'Arcy when he was getting research from his relation William. The derivation is Richard II of Normandie and Judith de Bretagne, their son being William de Areci who (later?) became a monk at F camp, their son being Norman D'Arcy. The following is from the Rootsweb Clare List archives (July 4, 2006): The genealogy of the Darcies of Clonuane in the county of Clare, and Kiltolla in the county of Galway : descended from the ancient and honourable family of the Darcies of Platten in the county of Meath, near the river Boyne, which descended from Sir John Darcy, who after being twice Lord Justice and General Governor of Ireland, was the third time constituted for life, in the year 1334, he descended from Sir Richard Darcy, who accompanied King William the Conqueror from Normandy into England in the year 1066, he descended from David, who was the first surnamed D'Arcy or Darcy and descended from Charlemagne or Charles the Great, King of France and emperor of the Romans. The family moved to Ireland when Sir John Darcy was sent as in the 1320s and, in 1334, "... was constituted for life in that eminent post of trust." (p. 10). He had already spent time as the British governor of Scotland. Sir John married twice; the D'Arcy family of England descends from him via his first wife, that of Ireland via the second wife Soldier of Fortune. Said to have been killed in the American War. Thought to be the Illigitimate son of Robert Earl of Holderness Commanded a regiment during the American War. Killed in action leaving 2 sons. On his voyage to America Col D'Arcy and his family were wrecked. They lost all their baggage and papers, which it is believed would have proved their noble descent. After her husband was killed Mrs D'Arcy returned to England with her sons. There is a mystery as to who / whether this Francis existed. No records have yet been found and Robert his son always refused to say who his father actually was. The link to the 4th Earl however is well documented though not as a direct relation (admitted anyway). From "Ancestral Voices" by Berta Ruck "We know that he was "wrecked" on his voyage to America to fight as a volunteer in the American war and that in this wreck personal papers including, birth certificate and documents with the names of his parents were lost. It was rumoured (not through family letters) but handed down talk that the loss of these personal papers was engineered to avaoid a possible scandal. The Yorkshire Myth - by rights perhaps he was not of that branch of the D'Arcy family - he had been taken on by them for some unexplained reason to PASS as their child." GAK D'A wrote " from a variety of circumstantial evidence I am inclined to believe that the General (Robert) was an illegitimate son of the last Earl of Holderness who died in 1788. The name Robert - The general having been born and educated in Yorkshire, passing his holidays in Holderness House, London. His silence about his father, of whom he never spoke. His powerful friend, the Marquiss of Townshend, a relation of Earl Holderness, taking him by the hand - and making much of him. My father saying he never knew who his grandfather was - One of his sons being named Considine, a family name with the Yorkshire D'Arcys." There is also a letter to GAKD'A from his cousin Frederick in Australia "your excellent father (J. D'Arcy) gave me to understand before he left England that the title of Holderness had been traced to you, or rather to the General (Robert) who was then alive. I think your father touched up a little by your uncle De La Warr, (Lady Catherine's dearest brother) thought of applying to Chancery but considered that he was not of sufficient financial calibre. I believe caviats are invited and always entered by Parties having spurious claims merely to exact tips. However I look upon you (George A K D'A) as the Earl of Holderness proper." If any of this is to be believed then Robert would be direct link to the 4th Earl and we would not be looking for the Thomas or Francis (Soldier of Fortune). There is also a possibility that he was from Westmeath and of the D'Arcy's of Platten - this was recorded by George Abbas D'Arcy when he was getting research from his relation William. The derivation is Richard II of Normandie and Judith de Bretagne, their son being William de Areci who (later?) became a monk at F camp, their son being Norman D'Arcy. The following is from the Rootsweb Clare List archives (July 4, 2006): The genealogy of the Darcies of Clonuane in the county of Clare, and Kiltolla in the county of Galway : descended from the ancient and honourable family of the Darcies of Platten in the county of Meath, near the river Boyne, which descended from Sir John Darcy, who after being twice Lord Justice and General Governor of Ireland, was the third time constituted for life, in the year 1334, he descended from Sir Richard Darcy, who accompanied King William the Conqueror from Normandy into England in the year 1066, he descended from David, who was the first surnamed D'Arcy or Darcy and descended from Charlemagne or Charles the Great, King of France and emperor of the Romans. The family moved to Ireland when Sir John Darcy was sent as in the 1320s and, in 1334, "... was constituted for life in that eminent post of trust." (p. 10). He had already spent time as the British governor of Scotland. Sir John married twice; the D'Arcy family of England descends from him via his first wife, that of Ireland via the second wife

Sources attached in the tree

  • Defranceski Family Site (23andMe) — https://www.myheritage.com/person-1028942_OYYV6ZA4P6JVB64FWNJP2WEVFUBFHTA_OYYV6ZA4P6JVB64FWNJP2WEVFUBFHTA/thomas-francis-darcy
  • Defranceski Family Site (23andMe) — https://www.myheritage.com/person-5560408_OYYV6GBNOYZ3O7RH4DLDSBJMAC35DTY_OYYV6GBNOYZ3O7RH4DLDSBJMAC35DTY/thomas-darcy

These are the citations the family tree carries. Where this archive has checked one against the original, it says so on the relevant page. Method →

← All 473 people · The families · The direct line · How claims are labelled