Angelo Bacchi
dates unknown
Attached on a baptism that is not his son's
| The tree says | Father of Caetano Bacchi |
|---|---|
| The record says | Named only in the 1779 entry, which cannot be ahn 214's |
Angelo and Catharina are in this pedigree solely because the 1779 Karlobag baptism names them as the child's parents. If that baptism belongs to a different Caetano Bacchi, they are that man's parents and not this line's. Nothing else anchors them — Catharina is one of the seven women here with no surname at all. Read it →
| Ahnentafel | 428 — generation 9, a direct ancestor of Hedviga |
|---|---|
| Record | @I504620@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 2 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
Where this comes from
this archive has shown something recorded about them to be wrong.
1 correction or note has been recorded against this page — set out above, and listed on What changed.
Where this sits on the line
Ahnentafel 428 — generation 9 of Hedviga's descent. Every person's father is twice their own number and their mother twice plus one, so this person's parents are 856 and 857.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
The spine →
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- death
Sources attached in the tree
None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →