The Blažević Archive
Direct ancestor · generation 7

Catherina (Catta) Luckinić

1727–1790 · Karlobag, Općina Karlobag, Ličko-senjska županija, Croatia

Born30 MAR 1727, Karlobag, Općina Karlobag, Ličko-senjska županija, Croatia
Died29 MAY 1790, Karlobag, Općina Karlobag, Ličko-senjska županija, Croatia
Ahnentafel105 — generation 7, a direct ancestor of Hedviga
Record@I1853@

Family

Catherina (Catta) Luckinić30 MAR 1727–29 MAY 1790generation 7 · ahnentafel 105
married 22 NOV 1747Jacob Pilipicd. 1778direct line
Sibling
Mare Luckinićb. 1725
a direct ancestor a record has been read for them an image, not yet read from the family tree, unverified

The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 4 relatives drawn here, 1 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words. 1relative is named in the tree but fall outside the eight surnames and have no page.

Where this comes from

a direct ancestor, with no record of their own read here.

How much of the direct line rests on a document →

Every record naming Luckinić →

Where this sits on the line

Ahnentafel 105generation 7 of Hedviga's descent. Every person's father is twice their own number and their mother twice plus one, so this person's parents are 210 and 211.

The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.

The spine →
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →

Events, as the record has them

  • birth 30 MAR 1727 Karlobag, Općina Karlobag, Ličko-senjska županija, Croatia
  • death 29 MAY 1790 Karlobag, Općina Karlobag, Ličko-senjska županija, Croatia

Sources attached in the tree

None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →

An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →