Domianus "Domian" Perpić
1820–1888 · Krivi Put 136, Senj, Lika, Austria-Hungary
One parent on record here is not a person
| Entered as the parent | Krivi Put 136 For Sorting Perpić |
|---|
That is a sorting label — a note somebody typed into the parent's slot while working through records. No priest wrote it and nobody was called it. The other parent is a real record. This is not a claim that the person is invented; the register entries behind them are real. It is a statement about the join. Why this matters →
A child born 74 years after his death
| The tree says | Died 1888; Georgius Prpić born 1962 |
|---|---|
| The record says | Not reconciled |
Seventy-four years. This is not a loose date but a join across three or four generations — a Georgius Prpić of 1962 attached to a man who died in 1888. The intervening people are missing rather than wrong. Read it →
His son's birth year is a typo, and the place proves it
| The tree says | Domianus Perpić died 1888, and his wife Maria Sojath in 1891 — yet their son Georgius Prpić is entered as born 26 March 1962 |
|---|---|
| The record says | Georgius's own birthplace is given as “Krivi Put 136, Senj, Lika, Austria-Hungary” |
This was reported here as three separate impossibilities — a child born after his father's death, a child born after his mother's, and a mother of 139. All three are one typing slip. <strong>Austria-Hungary ceased to exist in 1918</strong>, so nobody was born there in 1962; and Krivi Put 136 is this family's own house, where his parents lived. Everything in the record agrees with <strong>1862</strong> and nothing agrees with 1962. The archive does not edit the tree, so the entry stands as written — but the three contradictions it generated should be read as one, and as solved. Read it →
| Born | 1820, Krivi Put 136, Senj, Lika, Austria-Hungary |
|---|---|
| Died | 1888, Krivi Put 136, Senj, Lika, Austria-Hungary |
| Line | Perpić · everyone of the name → |
| Record | @I508659@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 16 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words. 2relatives are named in the tree but fall outside the eight surnames and have no page.1is judged living and withheld from this build entirely.
Where this comes from
this archive has shown something recorded about them to be wrong.
2 corrections and notes have been recorded against this page — set out above, and listed on What changed.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- death 1888 Krivi Put 136, Senj, Lika, Austria-Hungary
- birth 1820 Krivi Put 136, Senj, Lika, Austria-Hungary
Sources attached in the tree
None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →