Franciscus Francisci Žubrinić Xubrinich Zubrinic
1815–?
The only parent on record here is not a person
| Entered as the parent | Brothers of Casparus (It Seems) Žubrinić Xubrinich Zubrinic |
|---|
That is a sorting label — a note somebody typed into the parent's slot while working through records. No priest wrote it and nobody was called it. It is the only parent this record has, so nothing documented attaches this person to anyone. This is not a claim that the person is invented; the register entries behind them are real. It is a statement about the join. Why this matters →
| Born | BEF 1815 |
|---|---|
| Line | Žubrinić / Xubrinich / Zubrinic · everyone of the name → |
| Record | @I511659@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 5 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words. 1relative is named in the tree but fall outside the eight surnames and have no page.
Where this comes from
everything here comes from the family tree, and is unverified.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- death
- birth BEF 1815
Sources attached in the tree
None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →