The Blažević Archive
Boras

franjo Boras

1914–1940

Born3 MAR 1914
Died25 NOV 1940
LineBoras · everyone of the name →
Record@I505397@

Family

franjo Boras3 MAR 1914–25 NOV 1940Boras
marriedRuza prpic1919–1946tree only
a direct ancestor a record has been read for them an image, not yet read from the family tree, unverified

The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 9 relatives drawn here, 1 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.

Where this comes from

everything here comes from the family tree, and is unverified.

Every record naming Boras →

Where this sits in the family

Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.

The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.

Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →

Events, as the record has them

  • birth 3 MAR 1914
  • death 25 NOV 1940

Sources attached in the tree

  • Defranceski Family Site (23andMe) — https://www.myheritage.com/person-1500101_OYYV6NN54IMLYQ7PR6E7QYU2YSRQCWI_OYYV6NN54IMLYQ7PR6E7QYU2YSRQCWI/franjo-boras

An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →

Others of the same name

These parishes repeat their names relentlessly — 94 Marijas and 88 Ivans in this archive alone. These are different people, kept apart on purpose rather than merged into one. Merging on a name is exactly how this tree came to hold a man born after his own granddaughter.

Franjo Boras 1 OCT 1888–18 DEC 1943 Senj

Same name, and nothing here says they are related. Why the names repeat →