Joannis Antić
1739–1793
He was not called “Joannis”
| The tree records | Joannis |
|---|---|
| Which is | the genitive of Joannes |
These registers are narrative Latin. A priest writing baptizavi Josephum — “I baptised Josephus” — is writing a case ending, and filius Josephi is “son of Josephus”. Transcribed literally, the ending becomes the name. In life this person was Joannes, or its Croatian form. All forty of them →
| Born | 1739 |
|---|---|
| Died | 27 FEB 1793, Selce |
| Ahnentafel | 96 — generation 7, a direct ancestor of Hedviga |
| Record | @I504627@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 2 relatives drawn here, 1 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
Where this comes from
a direct ancestor, with no record of their own read here.
Where this sits on the line
Ahnentafel 96 — generation 7 of Hedviga's descent. Every person's father is twice their own number and their mother twice plus one, so this person's parents are 192 and 193.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
The spine →
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- birth 1739
- death 27 FEB 1793 Selce
Sources attached in the tree
- Marko Karic rodoslov — Joannis Antić, PAPA
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →
Others of the same name
These parishes repeat their names relentlessly — 94 Marijas and 88 Ivans in this archive alone. These are different people, kept apart on purpose rather than merged into one. Merging on a name is exactly how this tree came to hold a man born after his own granddaughter.
| Joannis Antić | 1765–13 MAR 1829 | Selce | direct line |
Same name, and nothing here says they are related. Why the names repeat →