The Blažević Archive
Kalanj

Joso Josip Josephus Kalanj

1851–? · Ledenice, Primorje-Gorski Kotar, Croatia

Born24 MAR 1851, Ledenice, Primorje-Gorski Kotar, Croatia
Baptised30 MAR 1851, Ledenice, Modrus-Fiume, Hungary
LineKalanj · everyone of the name →
Record@I512642@

Family

Parents
Antonius Kalanjb. 1810tree only
Lucia Komadina1814–1875not published here
Joso Josip Josephus Kalanj24 MAR 1851–?Kalanj
marriedManda Magdalena Marija Komadinanot published here
a direct ancestor a record has been read for them an image, not yet read from the family tree, unverified

The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 25 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words. 2relatives are named in the tree but fall outside the eight surnames and have no page.

Two children here carry one name — Anton Kalanj. In these parishes that is usually not an error: a child who died was very often replaced by a later child given the same name, and nine such deaths are implied across these four families by a name used twice. It is also exactly how a records-matcher makes one person out of two, which is why they are kept apart here and the reader is told.

Where this comes from

everything here comes from the family tree, and is unverified.

Every record naming Kalanj →

Where this sits in the family

Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.

The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.

Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →

Events, as the record has them

  • death
  • birth 24 MAR 1851 Ledenice, Primorje-Gorski Kotar, Croatia
  • christening 30 MAR 1851 Ledenice, Modrus-Fiume, Hungary

Sources attached in the tree

None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →

An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →