Mariam Boras
1821–?
He was not called “Mariam”
| The tree records | Mariam |
|---|---|
| Which is | the accusative of Maria |
These registers are narrative Latin. A priest writing baptizavi Josephum — “I baptised Josephus” — is writing a case ending, and filius Josephi is “son of Josephus”. Transcribed literally, the ending becomes the name. In life this person was Maria, or its Croatian form. All forty of them →
| Born | 12 SEP 1821 |
|---|---|
| Line | Boras · everyone of the name → |
| Record | @I506355@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 6 relatives drawn here, 1 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words. 1relative is named in the tree but fall outside the eight surnames and have no page.
Where this comes from
everything here comes from the family tree, and is unverified.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- birth 12 SEP 1821
- death
Notes carried in the tree
Reproduced as written, minus the automated copy-reference boilerplate. These are what the family and other researchers put down, not what this archive has verified.
Birth: "Croatia, Church Books, 1516-1994," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-899C-51T6?cc=2040054&wc=9R2M-L27%3A391644801%2C391920301%2C391920401 : 6 April 2015), Roman Catholic (Rimokatolička crkva) > Senj (Senj) > Births (Rođeni) 1756-1858 > image 242 of 589; Arhiva Hrvatske u Zagrebu (Croatia State Archives), Zagreb.
Sources attached in the tree
None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →