Michaelis / Michael / Miho / Michaël "Miko" Žubrinić
1817–?
Connected to this family only through a sorting label
Every route from Hedviga to this person passes through a sorting label — a working note sitting where an ancestor should be. This is not a claim that the person is invented; the register entries behind them are real. It is a statement about the join. Why this matters →
He was not called “Michaelis”
| The tree records | Michaelis |
|---|---|
| Which is | the genitive of Michael |
These registers are narrative Latin. A priest writing baptizavi Josephum — “I baptised Josephus” — is writing a case ending, and filius Josephi is “son of Josephus”. Transcribed literally, the ending becomes the name. In life this person was Michael, or its Croatian form. All forty of them →
| Born | 13 AUG 1817 |
|---|---|
| Line | Žubrinić · everyone of the name → |
| Record | @I506500@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 29 relatives drawn here, 1 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words. 1relative is named in the tree but fall outside the eight surnames and have no page.
More than one person in this chart carries the same name — Maria Žubrinić, Michael Miho Michaël Žubrinić. That is what the source says. This archive does not merge records on a name, so they are drawn separately even where one duplicated entry is the likelier explanation.
Where this comes from
everything here comes from the family tree, and is unverified.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- death
- birth 13 AUG 1817 "Croatia, Church Books, 1516-1994," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QSQ-G99F-M3RL?cc=2040054&wc=9R2D-16X : 16 July 2014), Roman Catholic (Rimokatolička crkva) > Otočac > Church Census (Stanje duša) 1710-1846 Marriages (Vjenčani) 1859-1872 Deaths (Umrli) 1780-1836, 1859-1872 > image 100 of 384; Arhiva Hrvatske u Zagrebu (Croatia State Archives), Zagreb.
Notes carried in the tree
Reproduced as written, minus the automated copy-reference boilerplate. These are what the family and other researchers put down, not what this archive has verified.
Adopted: "Croatia, Church Books, 1516-1994," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QSQ-G99F-M3RL?cc=2040054&wc=9R2D-16X : 16 July 2014), Roman Catholic (Rimokatolička crkva) > Otočac > Church Census (Stanje duša) 1710-1846 Marriages (Vjenčani) 1859-1872 Deaths (Umrli) 1780-1836, 1859-1872 > image 100 of 384; Arhiva Hrvatske u Zagrebu (Croatia State Archives), Zagreb.
Sources attached in the tree
None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →