Nikola Žubrinić (Xubrinic)
1880–? · Otočac, Croatia
His parents
| The tree says | Michael “Mate” Žubrinić and Maria Catharina Orešković — the same couple as Nicolaus, b. 1834 |
|---|---|
| The record says | Mate Žubrinić and Marija r. Orešković, both dead by 1910 — but a different couple |
His marriage at Senj on 3 July 1910, where he is kontrolor gradske daće, names his parents as ††Mate Žubrinić i Marija rodj. Orešković, poljodjelci. So both he and Nicolaus (1834) have parents of these names — forty-six years apart. There are two couples of the same two names a generation apart, and the tree has merged them. By date, Maria Catharina (b. 1835) belongs to this later couple, not to the 1834 one. Read it →
| Born | 23 AUG 1880, Otočac, Croatia |
|---|---|
| Line | Žubrinić (Xubrinic) · everyone of the name → |
| Record | @I505415@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 8 relatives drawn here, 1 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words. 1relative is named in the tree but fall outside the eight surnames and have no page.
Where this comes from
this archive has shown something recorded about them to be wrong.
1 correction or note has been recorded against this page — set out above, and listed on What changed.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- birth 23 AUG 1880 Otočac, Croatia
- death
Sources attached in the tree
None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →