Rozalija Boras
1888–1888
One parent on record here is not a person
| Entered as the parent | Unknown Illigitimate Father ? |
|---|
That is a sorting label — a note somebody typed into the parent's slot while working through records. No priest wrote it and nobody was called it. The other parent is a real record. This is not a claim that the person is invented; the register entries behind them are real. It is a statement about the join. Why this matters →
| Born | 1888 |
|---|---|
| Died | 1888 |
| Line | Boras · everyone of the name → |
| Record | @I505401@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 3 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
Where this comes from
everything here comes from the family tree, and is unverified.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- birth 1888
- death 1888 "Croatia, Church Books, 1516-1994," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QSQ-G99X-1HG5?cc=2040054&wc=9R2D-K6D%3A391644801%2C391920301%2C391921401 : 16 July 2014), Roman Catholic (Rimokatolička crkva) > Senj (Senj) > Deaths (Umrli) 1859-1907 > image 400 of 645; Arhiva Hrvatske u Zagrebu (Croatia State Archives), Zagreb.
Sources attached in the tree
- Defranceski Family Site (23andMe) — https://www.myheritage.com/person-1500130_OYYV6NN54IMLYQ7PR6E7QYU2YSRQCWI_OYYV6NN54IMLYQ7PR6E7QYU2YSRQCWI/rozalija-boras
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →