Angelika Boras
1857–1902 · Senj, Croatia
| Born | 1 SEP 1857, Senj, Croatia |
|---|---|
| Died | 28 SEP 1902 |
| Line | Boras · everyone of the name → |
| Record | @I504980@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 9 relatives drawn here, 2 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words. 4relatives are named in the tree but fall outside the eight surnames and have no page.
Where this comes from
an image is attached to them that has not been read out.
3 images are attached to this person , of which 3 are documents rather than photographs.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- death 28 SEP 1902
- birth 1 SEP 1857 Senj, Croatia "Croatia, Church Books, 1516-1994," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QSQ-G99C-5YFR?cc=2040054&wc=9R2M-L27%3A391644801%2C391920301%2C391920401 : 6 April 2015), Roman Catholic (Rimokatolička crkva) > Senj (Senj) > Births (Rođeni) 1756-1858 > image 570 of 589; Arhiva Hrvatske u Zagrebu (Croatia State Archives), Zagreb.
Documents and photographs
3 documents and 0 photographs in the MyHeritage media library carry this person's tag. None of them travelled in the GEDCOM. All of them →
A tag says somebody linked this image to this person — not that the person is in it. A register page is tagged to everyone it names. Method →
Sources attached in the tree
- Boras Web Site — https://www.myheritage.com/profile-OYYV6K6XBKGZPI2MNMEWEXKIXSIVTXI-1500065/angelika-kosina
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →