Joannes Ivan Boras
1855–1926 · Senj, Croatia, Senj, Općina Senj, Lika-Senj County, Croatia
A child born after his death
| The tree says | Died 1926; Blazenka Boras born 1930 |
|---|---|
| The record says | Not reconciled |
Four years. The child's own name is entered with a question mark in the tree — Blazenka? — so the record was uncertain before this archive read it. Read it →
Vladimira Baricević cannot be the mother of his children
| The tree says | Joannes Ivan Boras, born 1855, is married to Vladimira Baricević, born 12 December 1907 — a gap of 52 years — and fourteen children hang off her |
|---|---|
| The record says | Nine of the fourteen were born before she was, between 1888 and 1906 |
The children are his; the wife is wrong. A woman born in December 1907 did not bear Anđelika in 1888, Draga in 1891, Marija in 1892, Budimir in 1894, Pava and Paulina in 1895, Olga in 1902 or Krešo in 1906 — nor Zdenka in the same year she herself was born. This is the single largest contradiction in the archive and it is <strong>one wrong link</strong>, not fourteen. Vladimira is a real person attached to the wrong generation, in exactly the shape already documented for <a href='/TheBlazevic/people/maria-catharina-oreskovic-oreskovic/'>Maria Catharina Orešković</a>. Which of Joannes's wives actually bore them is not answerable from this file. Read it →
The same generation is skipped twice in this household
| The tree says | Ten children to Budimir Boras (1894–1954) and Marica Milković (b. 1904), and fourteen to Joannes Ivan Boras (b. 1855) and Vladimira Baricević (b. 1907) |
|---|---|
| The record says | Eight of the ten are born 1923–1933; the other two in 1946 and 1960 — the second six years after the father died |
Read together, the two generations make the same error. Domagoj (1946) and Vladimira (1960) are almost certainly <strong>grandchildren</strong> attached to their grandparents, and Vladimira Baricević, born 1907, is the right age to have married one of Joannes's sons rather than Joannes himself. If so, <strong>Joannes's real wife is missing from the record altogether</strong> — and one woman in the wrong slot accounts for eleven of the archive's sixty-three internal contradictions. Read it →
| Born | 24 JUN 1855, Senj, Croatia, Senj, Općina Senj, Lika-Senj County, Croatia |
|---|---|
| Died | 1926 |
| Occupation | carinska sluzba |
| Line | Boras · everyone of the name → |
| Record | @I506361@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 23 relatives drawn here, 3 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words. 2relatives are named in the tree but fall outside the eight surnames and have no page.
Where this comes from
this archive has shown something recorded about them to be wrong.
1 image is attached to this person , of which 1 are documents rather than photographs.
3 corrections and notes have been recorded against this page — set out above, and listed on What changed.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- death 1926
- birth 24 JUN 1855 Senj, Croatia, Senj, Općina Senj, Lika-Senj County, Croatia "Croatia, Church Books, 1516-1994," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-899C-5BQ8?cc=2040054&wc=9R2M-L27%3A391644801%2C391920301%2C391920401 : 6 April 2015), Roman Catholic (Rimokatolička crkva) > Senj (Senj) > Births (Rođeni) 1756-1858 > image 542 of 589; Arhiva Hrvatske u Zagrebu (Croatia State Archives), Zagreb.
Documents and photographs
1 document and 0 photographs in the MyHeritage media library carry this person's tag. None of them travelled in the GEDCOM. All of them →
A tag says somebody linked this image to this person — not that the person is in it. A register page is tagged to everyone it names. Method →
Sources attached in the tree
None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →