Read out of a register, and not in the family tree
Ivan Borić, son of Lojze Borić and Manole Mesić (Kamenica 23, 1892)
Baptism, 18 December 1892, Kamenica, Brinje parish, Croatia — son of Lojze Borić and Mesić Manole, of Kamenica house 23 - the third child on record of the Lojze (Alojz) Borić household, after Mijo (1888) and Marija (1889) - not in the tree.
The family tree has never heard of this person. Every other
person page in this archive is a record the MyHeritage export holds. This one is not: it exists
because the register was read at the page, and it is kept beside the tree rather than
put into it. The tree is an export and this archive does not edit it.
The whole list, and why it exists →
What the register says
- Event
- baptism
- Date
- 18 December 1892
- Place
- Kamenica, Brinje parish, Croatia
- Citation
- FamilySearch, Croatia Church Books 1516-1994, Brinje Matična knjiga rođenih 1888-1900 (DGS 005498262, waypoint 9R26-82S), image 193 (left-hand page, second entry; page 368), entry no. 129 - "BORIĆ IVAN", male, born 14 (written 'četrnajest' or 'petnajest') and registered 18 December 1892, of Kamenica house 23, son of BORIĆ LOJZE and MESIĆ MANOLE, both of Brinje, farmers, Croats. Informants "Sertić Pave i Marija", matičar Sertić Šimun. NOT IN THE TREE. FOUND ON 5 OCTOBER 2026 ON THE FULL READABLE-ZOOM RE-READ. The mother is Mesić Marica in the 1888 entry, Mesić Marija in the 1889 entry and Mesić Manole here and, as 'Manola', in the 1899 entry of this file: four spellings of one woman's name, so the Lojze Borić x Mesić household of Kamenica 23 has Mijo (1888), Marija (1889), Ivan (1892) and, as 'Alojz', Manole (1899). Lojze is Alojz, so this settles that the Alojz Borić of Kamenica 23 in 1895-1899 (this file) is the Lojze Borić of 1888-1892, one man with a Mesić wife and at least four children.
How they attach to the line
son of Lojze Borić and Mesić Manole, of Kamenica house 23 - the third child on record of the Lojze (Alojz) Borić household, after Mijo (1888) and Marija (1889) - not in the tree
The relation is recorded in the archive's own words and names no position on the direct line, so there is nobody here to link to yet.