Read out of a register, and not in the family tree
Joso Borić, son of Stipe Borić and Luce Sertić
Baptism, 18 August 1899, Kamenica, Brinje parish, Croatia — son of Borić Stipe and Sertić Luce, of Kamenica house 23 - a third Borić household at that house number - not in the tree.
The family tree has never heard of this person. Every other
person page in this archive is a record the MyHeritage export holds. This one is not: it exists
because the register was read at the page, and it is kept beside the tree rather than
put into it. The tree is an export and this archive does not edit it.
The whole list, and why it exists →
What the register says
- Event
- baptism
- Date
- 18 August 1899
- Place
- Kamenica, Brinje parish, Croatia
- Citation
- FamilySearch, Croatia Church Books 1516-1994, Brinje Matična knjiga rođenih (third item on the same film as DGS 005498262, waypoint 9R26-82S, entries numbering within calendar year 1899), image 462, entry no. 55 - "BORIĆ JOSO", male, born 18 August and registered 20 August 1899, of Kamenica house 23, son of BORIĆ STIPE and SERTIĆ LUCE (both entered as of Kamenica). Witnesses Blažanin Šime i Marija. Later marginal notes dated 1924 and 1982 record his own later civil events (not fully read). NOT IN THE TREE. KAMENICA HOUSE 23 NOW HOLDS THREE BORIĆ FATHERS IN THIS FILE: Tome Borić (son Tome, 1895, wife Mesić Manda-Marija), Alojz Borić (daughter Manole, January 1899, wife Mesić Manola) and now Stipe Borić (this child, wife Sertić Luce). The wives differ (Mesić, Mesić, Sertić), so these read as three households sharing one house number - the same shape already seen at Kamenica house 24 - rather than one man under three names; but Stipe and the Borić Stjepan who witnessed a Sertić baptism at Kamenica house 5 in 1895 (this file) may be one man, which is a plausible, unconfirmed link and not a merge. Another Borić man marrying a Sertić woman: Sertić is again the partner surname.
How they attach to the line
son of Borić Stipe and Sertić Luce, of Kamenica house 23 - a third Borić household at that house number - not in the tree
The relation is recorded in the archive's own words and names no position on the direct line, so there is nobody here to link to yet.