Read out of a register, and not in the family tree
Kate Perković, witness at the marriage of Bolešić Grgo and Vučetić Jela (1896)
Witness at a marriage, 9 February 1896, Brinje, Croatia — WITNESS (written Perhonić Kate, a woman) at the marriage of the widower Bolešić Grgo of Križpolje 5 and the widow Vučetić Jela of Brinje 211 - the first WOMAN named Perković in the marriage book, and the first Perković witness of 1896 - not in the tree.
The family tree has never heard of this person. Every other
person page in this archive is a record the MyHeritage export holds. This one is not: it exists
because the register was read at the page, and it is kept beside the tree rather than
put into it. The tree is an export and this archive does not edit it.
The whole list, and why it exists →
What the register says
- Event
- witness at a marriage
- Date
- 9 February 1896
- Place
- Brinje, Croatia
- Citation
- FamilySearch, Croatia Church Books 1516-1994, Brinje Matična knjiga vjenčanih 1888-1899 (DGS 005498262, waypoint 9R26-82S), image 637 (left-hand page; page 288), entry no. 11 of 1896 - married at Brinje on 9 (devet) veljače 1896: bridegroom "BOLEŠIĆ GRGO" (the Boležić/Božević of the births is a related name), udovac (widower), born at Križpolje 5, living at Križpolje; bride "VUČETIĆ JELE", udovica (widow), 34 years, born at Brinje house 211; parents' lines blank. Witnesses Pavlović Stjepan and "Perhonić Kate"; officiant Šrobi Šimun. NOT IN THE TREE. A woman Perhonić (Perković) standing as witness: the Perković Kate may be a wife or a daughter of the families of houses 115 or 101 (Perlić Jozo's wife is also Kate, but the surname there is Perlić), or of Križpolje, where Bolešić Grgo lives: not established. FOUND ON 6 OCTOBER 2026 ON THE FULL READABLE-ZOOM RE-READ OF THE MARRIAGE BOOK (images 493-690).
How they attach to the line
WITNESS (written Perhonić Kate, a woman) at the marriage of the widower Bolešić Grgo of Križpolje 5 and the widow Vučetić Jela of Brinje 211 - the first WOMAN named Perković in the marriage book, and the first Perković witness of 1896 - not in the tree
The relation is recorded in the archive's own words and names no position on the direct line, so there is nobody here to link to yet.