The Blažević Archive
Pavelic

Ante Pavelic

dates unknown

How this person is attached

Connected to this family only through a sorting label

Every route from Hedviga to this person passes through a sorting label — a working note sitting where an ancestor should be. This is not a claim that the person is invented; the register entries behind them are real. It is a statement about the join. Why this matters →

Disputed — this attachment does not hold

Named as a man, recorded and married as a woman

The tree saysAnte Pavelic, sex F, entered as the wife of Meijat Blažević and the mother of Lucia, born 1861
The record says47 of the 48 other people here whose name is a form of Ante are men — and the one exception is another woman this same check reports

The second of three wives in this tree carrying a man's forename. Three of them is a pattern rather than a slip, and the likeliest reading is that the name field holds something other than the woman's own given name. No register has been read that would show what. Read it →

Record@I508408@

Family

a direct ancestor a record has been read for them an image, not yet read from the family tree, unverified

The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 2 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.

Where this comes from

Disputed

this archive has shown something recorded about them to be wrong.

1 correction or note has been recorded against this page — set out above, and listed on What changed.

Every record naming Pavelic →

Where this sits in the family

Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.

The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.

Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →

Events, as the record has them

  • death

Sources attached in the tree

None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →

An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →