The Blažević Archive
Uroda

Anton Joanis Uroda

1780–? · Karlobag, Općina Karlobag, Ličko-senjska županija, Croatia

Born13 JUN 1780, Karlobag, Općina Karlobag, Ličko-senjska županija, Croatia
Record@I504622@

Family

Anton Joanis Uroda13 JUN 1780–?Uroda
a direct ancestor a record has been read for them an image, not yet read from the family tree, unverified

The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 3 relatives drawn here, 3 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.

1 document read

What the registers say about Anton Joanis

YearDocument The citation, in the register's own words
1780 baptism index only — the page has not been opened Karlobag, 13 June 1780 — INDEX ONLY, father «Georgius», mother «Maria». He stood in found.psv as «brother of ahnentafel 54» from 15 September until 21 September, when publishing blood rather than surnames put his own tree record on the site: born the same day to the same parents. Uroda is not one of the eight surnames, which is the only reason he was ever «found» rather than known notes/three-found-people-were-in-the-tree-all-along.md

Every document this archive has read →

Where this comes from

Read

a register or certificate has been read for this person.

Every record naming Uroda →

Where this sits in the family

Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.

The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.

Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →

Events, as the record has them

  • birth 13 JUN 1780 Karlobag, Općina Karlobag, Ličko-senjska županija, Croatia
  • death

Sources attached in the tree

None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →

An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →