ladislava (lada) bilubaric
1922–1942
Attachment to this family
| The tree says | Mother of ante Boras (1931–1967) |
|---|---|
| The record says | Born 11 June 1922 — nine years old at his birth |
Her husband Pavao Boras was nineteen in 1931, which is possible; she was nine, which is not. The mother link is the wrong one. Note also that Pavao is recorded dead on 16 December 1940 and Ladislava on 16 December 1942 — the same day two years apart, which is the sort of coincidence that usually turns out to be a copied field. Read it →
| Born | 11 JUN 1922 |
|---|---|
| Died | 16 DEC 1942 |
| Record | @I509344@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 2 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
Where this comes from
Disputed
this archive has shown something recorded about them to be wrong.
1 correction or note has been recorded against this page — set out above, and listed on What changed.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- birth 11 JUN 1922
- death 16 DEC 1942
Sources attached in the tree
- Grlica Web Site — https://www.myheritage.com/profile-OYYV6NN54IMLYQ7PR6E7QYU2YSRQCWI-1500100/ladislava-lada-bilubaric
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →