Leonardus Defranceschi
1766–1848
Connected to this family only through a sorting label
Every route from Hedviga to this person passes through a sorting label — a working note sitting where an ancestor should be. This is not a claim that the person is invented; the register entries behind them are real. It is a statement about the join. Why this matters →
| Born | 30 JAN 1766 |
|---|---|
| Died | 14 APR 1848 |
| Record | @I509461@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 5 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words. 25 relatives are named in the tree but fall outside the eight surnames and have no page.
More than one person in this chart carries the same name — Gian Giovanni Ivan Battista Defranceschi, Pietro Defranceschi, Leonardus Defranceschi, Guiseppe Josephus Josip Defranceschi, Maria Defranceschi. That is what the source says. This archive does not merge records on a name, so they are drawn separately even where one duplicated entry is the likelier explanation.
Where this comes from
Tree only
everything here comes from the family tree, and is unverified.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- birth 30 JAN 1766
- death 14 APR 1848
Sources attached in the tree
None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →