Marija Rogić
dates unknown
Connected to this family only through a sorting label
Every route from Hedviga to this person passes through a sorting label — a working note sitting where an ancestor should be. This is not a claim that the person is invented; the register entries behind them are real. It is a statement about the join. Why this matters →
| Record | @I511724@ |
|---|
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 8 relatives drawn here, 3 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
What the registers say about Marija
| Year | Document | The citation, in the register's own words |
|---|---|---|
| 1858 | named-on-a-child-baptism | Otočac, 8 January 1858 — «Confiniarius e Prozor N° 50», confirming the birthplace the tree already carries Named on Nikola Miko Žubrinić's entry rather than their own — a register names you is not a register is about you. notes/otocac-michael-house-numbers-2026-09-15.md |
Where this comes from
Read
a register or certificate has been read for this person.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Sources attached in the tree
- Matasic Majer Web Site — https://www.myheritage.com/profile-OYYV6WIX3U6ESG6ISZ644EV6GZXDOYI-1503189/marija-rogi%C4%87-%C5%BEubrini%C4%87
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →