Vjekoslava "Lojza" Pulanic
?–1893
| Died | 23 NOV 1893, Senj, Croatia |
|---|---|
| Record | @I504997@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 7 relatives drawn here, 2 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
What the registers say about Vjekoslava
| Year | Document | The citation, in the register's own words |
|---|---|---|
| 1883 | named-on-a-child-baptism index only — the page has not been opened | Senj, baptised 25 February 1883 — «Zvonimir Matej Vukelić», of «Petar Vukelić» and «Lojza Pulanić»; ark 1:1:X9DP-3Y7X. INDEX ONLY, not read from the image: the surname disagrees with this archive's own reading of «Putnić» at 5,812 px Named on Zvonimir Matei Vukelić's entry rather than their own — a register names you is not a register is about you. notes/senj-1907-vukelic-index.md |
Where this comes from
Read
a register or certificate has been read for this person.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- death 23 NOV 1893 Senj, Croatia
Sources attached in the tree
None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →