Mare Luckinić
1725–?
| Born | 13 APR 1725 |
|---|---|
| Record | @I504619@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 3 relatives drawn here, 3 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
What the registers say about Mare
| Year | Document | The citation, in the register's own words |
|---|---|---|
| 1725 | baptism index only — the page has not been opened | Karlobag, 13 April 1725 — INDEX ONLY, «Mare Luckinicha», father «Vicka Luckinicha», no mother named; ark 1:1:QKMX-Y4TT. She was in found.psv as a CANDIDATE sister of ahnentafel 105 from 20 September until 21 September, when publishing blood rather than surnames put her own tree record on the site — born 13 April 1725 to Vicentius Luckinić and Maria, the same day and the same father. The candidate and the person were always the same woman; the archive simply could not see one of them notes/the-kosina-are-filed-under-senia.md |
Where this comes from
Read
a register or certificate has been read for this person.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- birth 13 APR 1725
- death
Sources attached in the tree
None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →