The Blažević Archive
Baricevic

Vladimira Baricevic

1907–? · jablanac

Disputed — this attachment does not hold

Attachment to this family

The tree saysWife of Joannes «Ivan» Boras (1855–1926); mother of all fourteen of his children, born 1888–1930
The record saysBorn 12 December 1907 — nineteen years after the eldest of those children

She cannot be the mother of children born 1888–1906, and the tree gives Ivan Boras no other wife. One spouse slot is carrying more than one woman. The tell is in the list itself: Zdenka Boras is born 12 December 1907, the same day as Vladimira, so a daughter's birth date has been copied into the wife's record. Two of the children, pava and Paulina, also share 24 December 1895 and are probably one girl twice. Read it →

Born12 DEC 1907, jablanac
Record@I506362@

Family

Vladimira Baricevic12 DEC 1907–?Baricevic
marriedJoannes Ivan Boras1855–1926disputed
a direct ancestor a record has been read for them an image, not yet read from the family tree, unverified

The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 15 relatives drawn here, 0 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.

Where this comes from

Disputed

this archive has shown something recorded about them to be wrong.

1 correction or note has been recorded against this page — set out above, and listed on What changed.

Every record naming Baricevic →

Where this sits in the family

Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.

The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.

Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →

Events, as the record has them

  • death
  • birth 12 DEC 1907 jablanac

Sources attached in the tree

None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →

An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →