Otilija Kosina
1920–1943
| Born | 1920 |
|---|---|
| Died | 1943 |
| Record | @I506274@ |
Family
The mark describes the person, not the link. Of the 6 relatives drawn here, 5 have a document of their own in this archive — but that is not the same as a document tying them to this person. This archive holds no separate proof for most parent–child links; where it does, the note above this chart says so in words.
What the registers say about Otilija
| Year | Document | The citation, in the register's own words |
|---|---|---|
| 1943 | grave | Senj, the OTILIJA i NEDA KOSINA stone, read at 4x from photos/line/9000003-otilija-and-neda-kosina-gravestone-senj.jpg — «OTILIJA … čin. Velike župe · ✻1920. †11.11.1943.» Her occupation is činovnica Velike župe, a clerk of the Velika župa. THE DAY THIS ARCHIVE HAD NEVER HAD: 11 November 1943, FIVE WEEKS AFTER THE RAID that killed her father, and the stone does NOT call her a victim of it notes/otilija-died-in-november-and-neda-was-the-raid.md |
Where this comes from
Read
a register or certificate has been read for this person.
1 image is attached to this person , of which 1 is a document rather than a photograph.
Where this sits in the family
Not on the direct line. They are published because they belong to one of the eight surnames this archive follows.
The register spells this surname more than one way, and the search folds the forms together — so Xubrinich and Žubrinić, Joannis and Ivan, find each other.
Where this surname sits on the map →
What the tree says that cannot be true →
Events, as the record has them
- birth 1920
- death 1943
Documents and photographs
1 document and 0 photographs in the MyHeritage media library carry this person's tag. None of them travelled in the GEDCOM. All of them →
A tag says somebody linked this image to this person — not that the person is in it. A register page is tagged to everyone it names. Method →
Sources attached in the tree
None. This person carries no source string at all in the tree. They may still be right — but nothing here can be checked without going to the register. Method →
An online family tree is a witness, not a source. Where a citation points at a parish register or a FamilySearch image, that is the thing worth going to. Sources →