Giacomo de Franceschi (m. 1772)

…Anzola bore the 1737 twins and died, that Francisca followed from 1743, and that «the two women do not overlap». They overlap, and the proof was already in this archive when the claim was written. households.json has carried h107 Giacomo de Franceschi × Pascasia, four children 1750–1759, read off the same volume at images 155, 163, 169 and 179, since long before this session opened the film. Francisca is Jacobo's wife in 1743 and twice in 1752. Pascasia is bearing his children from 1750. One man…

…Sept 2026 process A correction was published and then not applied — the child stayed in the wrong household for five days Households — households.json, entries h107 and h113 h113 «Giacomo de Franceschi × Francisca Marcario», 1743–1743, one child: Casparus. And in its own words: «five months after Francisca bore Casparus», and «the parish held two contemporary Jacobos, and this household is the Marcario one». Casparus's mother…

…1762 to December 1775 — about 230 marriages, twenty-six appearances of the name. Three of them are marriages of the name, two are widows remarrying, the rest are witnessings.· 22 Oct 1765 — «Domenico Calluzzi q.m Pietro … con Pasqua Ved.a q.m Giacomo de Franceschi in 2di uoti». Pascasia a widow, and the first dated death of any Jacobo at this castle.· 9 Feb 1766 — «Con Elena figlia di q.m Mattio de Franceschi», marrying Mattio Santalezza of the Albona territory, twelve years resident, admitted…

…son of Jacobo at last — and the Carnian road runs both ways Three more openings, and 1784 gives up two things the register had never said. 19 July 1784 — the house of Jacobo finally produces a son. «Zuanne figlio del q. Giacomo de Franceschi contrasse li primi sponsali con Antonia figlia del q. Antonio, ambi di questa Parrochia» — film 005497886, frame 96. (doc.) Until today this line knew Jacobo's household only through its women — Antonia…

…the castle's Giacomo is the man this archive files as «at least two men», and this act does not decide which — or whether the two are really two. A son of a dead Giacomo de Franceschi of this parish is all it says, and all this page says. 21 February 1784 — and Antonia is dead. «Gioan Battista Steffanutto nativo della Carnia, vedovo della q. Antonia nata de Franceschi» marries Angiola, widow of the late Domenico…

…child of that house this page has now found, and they arrive fifteen years apart: | | married | as | |---|---|---| | Antonia | 7 January 1779 | «Ant.a figlia del q.m Giacomo», to a Carnian | | Zuanne | 19 July 1784 | «Zuanne figlio del q. Giacomo de Franceschi» | | Pasqua | 19 May 1794 | «Pasqua figlia del q.m Giacomo Defranceschi» | Their father was already dead in 1779 and is still «q.m» in 1794, so he died before the first of these weddings and the three are consistent with one man's…

…«q.m» in 1794, so he died before the first of these weddings and the three are consistent with one man's family. ⚠ And there is a Pasqua before her. This page records, at 22 October 1765, «Domenico Calluzzi q.m Pietro … con Pasqua Ved.a q.m Giacomo de Franceschi in 2di voti» — a Pasqua who was the WIDOW of a Giacomo de Franceschi, remarrying. A daughter named for her mother is the obvious reading, and this archive has just used that very reasoning on the Kalanj stones, where a Rozalija stands…

…are consistent with one man's family. ⚠ And there is a Pasqua before her. This page records, at 22 October 1765, «Domenico Calluzzi q.m Pietro … con Pasqua Ved.a q.m Giacomo de Franceschi in 2di voti» — a Pasqua who was the WIDOW of a Giacomo de Franceschi, remarrying. A daughter named for her mother is the obvious reading, and this archive has just used that very reasoning on the Kalanj stones, where a Rozalija stands beside a Rosalia. It is not claimed. (doc for both entries; the…

…no Defranceschi child of any Antonio in it, which is a real result and a wide one: it moves the question from where in this volume to was he baptised in this parish at all. The same frames handed over a different household almost complete. Giacomo de Franceschi and Pascasia turn up as parents in 1750, 1753, 1756 and 1759 — four children, three forenames, one of them lost to smeared ink. None of that was being looked for. A page-by-page read collects everything on the page, and the entries you were not hunting…

…two days this archive read Gasparo and Giacomo de Franceschi as two households at Svetvinčenat, because both stand godparent through the 1750s and both have a wife named in the entries. Then one line of 1762 — «Gasparo figlio di M.o Giacomo de Franceschi» — collapsed them into a father and his grown son, and a second instance four months later confirmed it. The lesson is about what godparent entries can and cannot carry. Dozens of them establish that two forenames are active in a parish at once.…

…Mitrovich (Pastovichio) Francesco de Franceschi the first of the family Bernardo Alessandri Pietro Manzutto Giuseppe Roselli Dott. Giacomo de Franceschi di Seghetto «of Seghetto» — the manor this page is about Giov. Batt. de Franceschi di Seghetto «of Seghetto» Ettore de Franceschi di Umago the last mayor before 1918 Eight mayors between…

…1766 | 7 | two | Frame 53 carries a marriage and a widow, and between them they date two deaths. 22 October 1765 — «Domenico Calluzzi q.m Pietro … con Pasqua Ved.a q.m Giacomo de Fran-/ceschi in 2di uoti». Pascasia, widow of Giacomo de Franceschi, remarrying. The marriage book confirms a couple the baptism book built, it dates the death of a Jacobo for the first time in this archive, and it gives the two-men question a test by arithmetic: any living Giacomo de Franceschi acting after 22…

…widow of Giacomo de Franceschi, remarrying. The marriage book confirms a couple the baptism book built, it dates the death of a Jacobo for the first time in this archive, and it gives the two-men question a test by arithmetic: any living Giacomo de Franceschi acting after 22 October 1765 cannot be Pascasia's husband. 9 February 1766 — «Con Elena figlia di q.m Mattio de Franceschi nativa di questo Castello», marrying Mattio Santalezza of the territory of Albona, resident in the district…

…— and a correction this item owes itself. ⚠ First the correction. This item said the marriage register had never been opened. That was wrong. What was missing was the film number in this worklist — not the register. The archive already held Giacomo de Franceschi (m. 1772), read from frame 63; Giacomo de Franceschi, d. before 1771, from frame 62; and six 1773 witnessings by Antonio de Franceschi…

…had never been opened. That was wrong. What was missing was the film number in this worklist — not the register. The archive already held Giacomo de Franceschi (m. 1772), read from frame 63; Giacomo de Franceschi, d. before 1771, from frame 62; and six 1773 witnessings by Antonio de Franceschi with his son Vittorio, from frame 64. Three of the…

…do not enter credentials. The sweep resumes at frame 94; frames 79–93 are read, written up and pushed. Resumed 29 September (David restored the FamilySearch session). Read to frame 96 (mid-1784). Two findings: Zuanne figlio del q. Giacomo de Franceschi, the first son of Jacobo's house the register names, and Antonia «nata de Franceschi» dead 1779×1784, from her Carnian widower's remarriage. The Carnian count off this film stands at five in ten years. Next: frame 97 onward. 29 September —…