Victoria di Pietro Defranceschi (1746)
Everything this archive holds under this name, gathered from every page of the site.
The person of this name
This page is a name index. The person has their own page.
- Victoria di Pietro Defranceschi (1746) — 1746, Svetvinčenat
«Die 10. Februarij, 1746. Victoria filia Petri Defranceschi, et Jacoba ejus legitima uxoris amborum ex hac Parochia, nata die 1mo currentis, (de licentia mei infrascripti) baptizata fuit a R.do D.no Petro Tobis Canc.; Patrini ad Sanctum Fontem fuerunt, Joannes Clozo faber, et Maria filia defuncti Matthei Bergovi.» — born 1 February, baptised 10 February 1746. Magnified. Fourth child of Pietro de Franceschi of Svetvincenat and Jacoba, and the last so far — the household now runs 1738 to 1746. (doc.) Her godfather is a smith, as her eldest sister's was. Joannes Clozo faber here; Blasius Marsoni faber at Anna Euphemia's font in 1738. Two smiths, eight years apart, for the same household. (inf, and only an observation.) Film 005497885, images 142–143 — Births 1709–1764 of Svetvinčenat, read on the plate 23 September 2026. In no index anywhere.
This archive holds 2 other pages under what Say Your Name reconciles as the same given name in another language — a Latin register, a Venetian clerk, a Croatian village, a Hungarian office. They are not merged and none of them is claimed to be this person: a shared name is not a shared identity, and the archive will not join one to the other by machine. It is here so that a reader looking for a man the records called Josephus can see where they wrote him Josip.
Victoria di Jacobo Defranceschi (1750) · Victoria di Matteo Defranceschi (1749)
Appears on: Our line, drawn · Lives on one scale
This person has not been written up in an essay yet — most often read straight off a register page that no index anywhere contains. What is known is at the top, and the pages linked above are where the finding sits.
A dossier is every mention of a name anywhere in this archive's data, gathered automatically and linked back to the page it appears on, with what the archive knows about the person set out at the top. Identity here is by NAME, not by resolved individual: where two people share a name they share a dossier, and the archive says so rather than guessing. Rebuilt from the roster, so every person the archive can name has a page — including the ones read straight off a register that no index anywhere contains.